做过的朋友觉得难度如何,奇怪的是我连game都有一个疑问死都没想明白
还有阅读和逻辑的,谁做过的有印象,可以讨论一下吗?
这个真题解析我没找到
我做了
你把不明白的贴上来
大家讨论吧
谢谢你的回复....
很感激
RC的12题我很不理解,C选项几乎和最后一段的example一样,为什么选择B呢?而且example里也没提及expected的situational factors啊?
还有第20题,根据上下文,是如何推测出的呢?A不是更衔接一些么?
22题选择D就更加困惑了,这不是全局题么?D说的是最后一段才提到的部分,A怎么就不合适呢?
第二篇LR里的22题paralle,当时在D和E上犹豫了好久,似乎E也看着合适,他有什么错误呢?
剩下居然还有个game不懂,简直汗死了,第18,怎么C全选不可以呢? 看不出X和Z的选择有什么区别
如果您都能帮我回顾和解答一下,实在是much obliged.
RC 12:
But situational factors do not account for all
code-switching; it occurs even when the domain
would lead one not to expect it. In these cases, one
language tends to be the primary one, while the other
is used only sparingly to achieve certain rhetorical
effects. Often the switches are so subtle that the
speakers themselves are not aware of them. This was
the case with a study of a family of Puerto Rican
Americans in another community. Family members
believed they used only English at home, but their
taped conversations occasionally contained some
Spanish, with no change in situational factors.
When asked what the presence of Spanish signified, they
commented that it was used to express certain
attitudes such as intimacy or humor more
emphatically.
That's B
RC 20:
However, while a literary work is indeed
encoded in various signs and symbols that must be
translated for the work to be understood and
appreciated, it is not a map.
The author here is only conceding a point that "a reader must be guided by the text to some degree" and then stress his OWN point that these "signs and symbols" should not dictate readers like they do in a map.
RC 22:
Main point of this passage is given in the last sentence in the first passage: " There is therefore a need to consider the different intellectual property policies that govern the commercial exploitation of faculty inventions in order to determine which would provide the appropriate level of flexibility." The whole passage was analyzing current polices and pointing out their weakness. In the final paragraph, the author give his anwer that mirrors the main point.
D summrizes the whole things well.
A missed the author's main point. The author clearly says "flexibility" is needed, which is 180 to what A says : a clear-cut policy.
LR 22
22. Taking advanced mathematics courses should increase
a student’s grade point average, for, as numerous studies have shown, students who have taken one or more advanced mathematics courses are far more likely to have high grade point averages than students who have not taken such courses. The flawed pattern of reasoning in the argument above is most similar to that in which one of the following? (A) Fur color is in large measure hereditary, for, as many studies have shown, black cats are more likely than others to have black kittens, and orange cats are more likely to have orange kittens. (B) Water can cause intoxication. After all, imbibing scotch and water, whiskey and water, bourbon and water, gin and water, and vodka and water all cause intoxication. (C) Eating a diet consisting primarily of fats and carbohydrates may cause weight gain in some people. Studies have shown that many overweight people eat such diets. (D) Buying running shoes should increase the frequency with which a person exercises, since those who buy two or more pairs of running shoes each year tend to exercise more often than those who buy at most one pair. (E) Reading to children at an early age should inspire them to read on their own later, since studies have shown that children who have not been read to are less likely to develop an interest in reading than children who have been read to. When you see "flawed pattern of reasoning", the first thing you need to do is to figure out what flaw it is. The author here apparently wants to establish a cause-effect relationship, but he/she got a complete 180: taking the effect as cause. Students who are good at math (above average score) are more likely to take advanced math courses, not the other way around. is most similar to that in which one of the following? (A) Fur color is in large measure hereditary, for, as many studies have shown, black cats are more likely than others to have black kittens, and orange cats are more likely to have orange kittens. (B) Water can cause intoxication. After all, imbibing scotch and water, whiskey and water, bourbon and water, gin and water, and vodka and water all cause intoxication. (C) Eating a diet consisting primarily of fats and carbohydrates may cause weight gain in some people. Studies have shown that many overweight people eat such diets. (D) Buying running shoes should increase the frequency with which a person exercises, since those who buy two or more pairs of running shoes each year tend to exercise more often than those who buy at most one pair. (E) Reading to children at an early age should inspire them to read on their own later, since studies have shown that children who have not been read to are less likely to develop an interest in reading than children who have been read to. When you see "flawed pattern of reasoning", the first thing you need to do is to figure out what flaw it is. The author here apparently wants to establish a cause-effect relationship, but he/she got a complete 180: taking the effect as cause. Students who are good at math (above average score) are more likely to take advanced math courses, not the other way around.
studies have shown, students who have taken one or
more advanced mathematics courses are far more likely
to have high grade point averages than students who
have not taken such courses.
The flawed pattern of reasoning in the argument above is most similar to that in which one of the following? (A) Fur color is in large measure hereditary, for, as many studies have shown, black cats are more likely than others to have black kittens, and orange cats are more likely to have orange kittens. (B) Water can cause intoxication. After all, imbibing scotch and water, whiskey and water, bourbon and water, gin and water, and vodka and water all cause intoxication. (C) Eating a diet consisting primarily of fats and carbohydrates may cause weight gain in some people. Studies have shown that many overweight people eat such diets. (D) Buying running shoes should increase the frequency with which a person exercises, since those who buy two or more pairs of running shoes each year tend to exercise more often than those who buy at most one pair. (E) Reading to children at an early age should inspire them to read on their own later, since studies have shown that children who have not been read to are less likely to develop an interest in reading than children who have been read to. When you see "flawed pattern of reasoning", the first thing you need to do is to figure out what flaw it is. The author here apparently wants to establish a cause-effect relationship, but he/she got a complete 180: taking the effect as cause. Students who are good at math (above average score) are more likely to take advanced math courses, not the other way around.
is most similar to that in which one of the following?
(A) Fur color is in large measure hereditary, for, as
many studies have shown, black cats are more
likely than others to have black kittens, and
orange cats are more likely to have orange
kittens.
(B) Water can cause intoxication. After all, imbibing
scotch and water, whiskey and water, bourbon
and water, gin and water, and vodka and water
all cause intoxication.
(C) Eating a diet consisting primarily of fats and
carbohydrates may cause weight gain in some
people. Studies have shown that many
overweight people eat such diets.
(D) Buying running shoes should increase the
frequency with which a person exercises, since
those who buy two or more pairs of running
shoes each year tend to exercise more often
than those who buy at most one pair.
(E) Reading to children at an early age should
inspire them to read on their own later, since
studies have shown that children who have not
been read to are less likely to develop an
interest in reading than children who have been
read to.
When you see "flawed pattern of reasoning", the first thing you need to do is to figure out what flaw it is. The author here apparently wants to establish a cause-effect relationship, but he/she got a complete 180: taking the effect as cause. Students who are good at math (above average score) are more likely to take advanced math courses, not the other way around.
D presents a same logic flaw: reversed cause-effect relationship. People who like running would be more likely to buy running shoes.
E presents a legitimate case of causation. And another point of unparallelness is that chirldren are READ to, which is not their own action. In the stimulus both score high and selection of advanced courses are one's own action.
Something is wrong with the editing and I cannot fix it.
Sorry, it looks messy.
好详细，佩服！
补充一小点：RC 12, 选项C还错在“often”. Puerto Rican的例子里，line54只说"occasionally contained some Spanish"。
建议：买Powerscore的2004 LSAT Deconstructed，里面有2004年的三套题和全部解释。加上LSAC的SuperPrep一起看，很有帮助。
thank u guys, so much appreciation
i have looked for this book mentioned above, but it seems that only Amazon has one.
do u have used one?
for the game question.
My PROBLEM is I was thinking they were asking me the full possibility that the F may apply for, but it seems that the answer matches the one meaning only one of them.
so it is the problem
Does this question type in other situations not mean the full probabilities?
我之前也有过同样的问题，后来发现这种题一般有两种问法
1 which of the following *** each of which could be ***
这种问题就是将每个选项中每一个元素单独考虑，比如这道game题如果这么问的话，选项给出X，Y，Z就是正确的
2 which of the following is an accurate and complete ******
类似这种问法就表明每一个选项就是针对某一种情况的，其中的元素不能分开来考虑，他们是一个组合，这道game题的原题就是
这个意思，所以不能选xyz
thanks, fully-understanding the question is so important...
No doubt I was in confusion...
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |