92.
According to the new office smoking regulations, only employees who have enclosed office may smoke at their desks. Virtually all employees with enclosed offices are at the professional level, and virtually all secretarial employees lack enclosed offices. Therefore, secretaries who smoke should be offered enclosed offices.
Which of the following is an assumption that enables the conclusion above to be properly drawn?
(A) Employees at the professional level who do not smoke should keep their enclosed offices.
(B) Employees with enclosed offices should not smoke at their desks, even though the new regulations permit them to do so.
(C) Employees at the secretarial level should be allowed to smoke at their desks, even if they do not have enclosed offices.
(D) The smoking regulations should allow all employees who smoke an equal opportunity to do so, regardless of an employee’s job level.
(E) The smoking regulations should provide equal protection from any hazards associated with smoking to all employees who do not smoke.
我实在没搞懂为什么答案D是对的，就算看了以前的帖子，还是么懂。：（
1. regulation说，有单独房间的 -》可以在桌边抽烟
2. 有单独房间的 -》是专业级别的
3. 秘书没有单独房间
||
\/
结论：秘书应该有单独房间
这个GAP怎么解释啊？？？？？？
求救求救啊。
||
\/
我的理解是这样的
1. 有单独房间的,可以在桌边抽烟
2. 有单独房间的, 是专业级别的 (这句对于这个推理没有用)
3. 秘书没有单独房间
4. Assumption (额外/隐含条件)
||
V
结论：秘书应该有单独房间
也就是这个推理中需要填入一个assumption（或者称额外/隐含条件），才能让“结论”成立。所以，D是最符合逻辑的。
回得有点晚,希望有所帮助.
典型的类比推理
类比推理的形式
A对象有属性a,b,c,d
B对象有属性a,b,c
所以B对象也有属性d Professional level: a.抽烟 Secretary: a. 抽烟 所以，抽烟的秘书也应该有封闭的房间(c属性) 类比推理的assumption应该是指出比较对象之间有可比性，即秘书也和professional level的职工一样有权利拥有一个可以抽烟的封闭房间（属性b）
b. 有封闭的房间可以抽烟
c. 有一个封闭房间
Professional level: a.抽烟
b. 有封闭的房间可以抽烟
c. 有一个封闭房间
Secretary: a. 抽烟
所以，抽烟的秘书也应该有封闭的房间(c属性)
类比推理的assumption应该是指出比较对象之间有可比性，即秘书也和professional level的职工一样有权利拥有一个可以抽烟的封闭房间（属性b）
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |