78. (28735-!-item-!-188;#058&003712)
The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has increased unchecked in recent years as a result of the removal of the native fox population and the clearing of surrounding woodlands.
(A) years as a result of the removal of
(B) years as a result of removing
(C) years, resulting from the removing of
(D) years, which is a result of removing
(E) years, which is a result of the removal of
I know the answer is (A) but the question uses "clearing" not "clearance". Should the question use "Clearance" to trigger people to use "removal"?
就是A C 兩個需要比較
先說removal比removing好 因為有名詞型態 就不用Ving
問題是不平行? 那來看一下removing有沒有問題
The removal is one time thing 一直removing 確實有點怪
而一直clearing 若有錢有人去做 沒人會反對吧?
再看as a result of vs. resulting from
X as a result of Y -> 語氣上強調 Y cause X, 句子重心為Y
X resulting from Y -> "resulting" is modifier, cause Y是用來輔助說明X, 句子的重心在X
(用法上 resulting from通常也緊接在X後面)
C的resulting from會貌似modify "years"
句意上 從中文看都是一樣的 但英文兩者會傳達出不同的語氣 所以用原句比較不會distorting
我的理由也不盡完美 有請大牛 謝謝指教!
8楼解释的很好,我补一句。, resulting from是可以的,作伴随状语表结果,修饰前面整句句子。但是,这样就和原句的意思有略微的差别了。
这题我只能从the removal of比the removing of要好来入手。因为这里是the + n.的结构,所以有名词的还是用名词比用动名词要好。
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |