ChaseDream
标题: [紧急]提醒本月JJ的一道错题，顺便问下各位NN们考前的建议 [打印本页]
作者: dustychen 时间: 2007-9-5 21:43
标题: [紧急]提醒本月JJ的一道错题，顺便问下各位NN们考前的建议
orthopedists are concerned about possibly having misjudged the stability of the fracture. When number of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, however, all the fractures that had initially been judged stable were found to have healed correctly. Therefore, it is a waste of money to order follow-up x-rays of ankle fracture initially judged stable.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
A. Doctors who are general practitioners rather than orthopedists are less likely than orthopedists to judge the stability of an ankle fracture correctly.
B. Many ankle injuries for which an initial x-ray is ordered are revealed by the x-ray not to involve any fracture of the ankle.
C. X-rays of patients of many different orthopedists working in several hospitals were reviewed.
D. The healing of ankle fractures that have been surgically repaired is always checked by means of a follow-up x-ray.
E. Orthopedists routinely order follow-up x-rays for fractures of bone other than ankle bones.
此题我问GWD，他说肯定选B。
C沾边，但是没B好。
顺便问下，
1. 后天上考场了，考试前能去早一点，自己要求做在墙角那个位置吗？我抗干扰不行。
2. 只剩1天了，作文还没练过，数学JJ还没有看完，PP3的模考也没有考过。明天应该模考，还是继续看JJ练作文？
谢谢各位的建议！我感激不尽。
[此贴子已经被作者于2007-9-5 21:51:28编辑过]
作者: tianc 时间: 2007-9-5 21:46
oh my GOD.
作者: dustychen 时间: 2007-9-5 21:48
顺便问下，
1. 后天上考场了，考试前能去早一点，自己要求做在墙角那个位置吗？我抗干扰不行。
2. 只剩1天了，作文还没练过，数学JJ还没有看完，PP3的模考也没有考过。明天应该模考，还是继续看JJ练作文？
谢谢各位的建议！我感激不尽。
[此贴子已经被作者于2007-9-5 21:48:49编辑过]
作者: Edm3962 时间: 2007-9-5 22:19
我觉得模考还是要的吧.反正才3个小时,找找感觉..PREP最好了
JJ也挺重要的,实在没时间就像我一样看看数学和阅读吧.作文我也准备放弃了..把JJ的作文看看考场上去瞎写吧..加油吧!
作者: emmadon 时间: 2007-9-5 22:30
如果你第一个去到，一般都给你安排在最好的位置的。反正广州是这样的~
能否解释一下这题？不懂~
作者: gonghao 时间: 2007-9-5 22:33
那题B说的是initial X-ray
可文章说的是follow-up-X-ray
B应该是无关吧
选C加强
作者: jojolynn 时间: 2007-9-5 22:39
能不能翻译一下B的意思啊,多谢
作者: emmadon 时间: 2007-9-5 22:45
以下是引用gonghao在2007-9-5 22:33:00的发言：那题B说的是initial X-ray
可文章说的是follow-up-X-ray
B应该是无关吧
选C加强
同意。
作者: dustychen 时间: 2007-9-5 23:07
GWD说答案不是推出来的
是比出来的，如果不知道选什么，比着来。
先把ADE扔了，剩下BC开比，
A说有一帮人来判断这东西的稳定性，医生和X-RAY之间有什么关系，原文没提；
B说受伤是不是包含脚踝断裂；
C说X-RAYS在什么情况下被REVIEW，原文没说；
D说治愈的方式，原文没有提；
E强调的是不是经常……，原文没提。
瞎蒙都选B，因为B是前提啊
[此贴子已经被作者于2007-9-5 23:07:18编辑过]
作者: dustychen 时间: 2007-9-5 23:09
反正我不骗你们的
大家都是战友
大家帮我参考下，
明天看JJ还是做一份Prep?
谢谢！
作者: jojolynn 时间: 2007-9-5 23:12
我也是后天,7号
也没有摸考,JJ也没有看完.
不过还是准备明天摸考一下,至少有PACE的感觉.
作者: cakemouse 时间: 2007-9-5 23:35
jj + 一次模考
模考建议跳过数学,直接做VERBAL,主要体会界面,不用在意分数.
作者: dustychen 时间: 2007-9-6 00:16
谢谢各位的建议
祝你们都好运！
作者: YiYaYiYaYou 时间: 2007-9-6 02:41
Believe me, I asked 2 English PhD students and an Instructor about this question at the ESL center, Choose C. More sample, more convincing.
作者: ElleYu 时间: 2007-9-6 05:39
I don't agree with C, since it only repeats the premise of the argument. But B doesn't seem make related to the conculsion in any way. The passage talks about follow-up x-rays on ankle injury envolving fracture are wasting money, but it does not discuss the injured anckles not envolving fracture...
作者: dennyhuang 时间: 2007-9-6 09:59
orthopedists are concerned about possibly having misjudged the stability of the fracture. When number of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, however, all the fractures that had initially been judged stable were found to have healed correctly. Therefore, it is a waste of money to order follow-up x-rays of ankle fracture initially judged stable.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
B. Many ankle injuries for which an initial x-ray is ordered are revealed by the x-ray not to involve any fracture of the ankle.
C. X-rays of patients of many different orthopedists working in several hospitals were reviewed.
我觉得BC都有道理 原题
rthopedists担心错误诊断了stability of the fracture,当看过大量的二次x光复查后发现所有开始诊断stable的都愈合了(开始stable有可能就是没骨折),所以,开始诊断是stable的做二次x光复查是一种浪费.
B很多第一次做x光的ankle创伤都显示不是骨折
C不同的orth的病人的x光片被复查(第一次x片被(可能是两人)review stable,就说明再做一次x片的意义不大)
不过我第一眼看这题时倾向B,看了很多人选c后,我琢磨一下觉得c也有道理.
作者: babycake 时间: 2007-9-6 12:41
这道题，逻辑的大大NN lawyer_1有过阐述。我觉得他讲的肯定是对的，因为经过其他无数大大NN的验证。C就说明“样本具有代表性”,所以是支持。
作者: dennyhuang 时间: 2007-9-6 14:07
以下是引用babycake在2007-9-6 12:41:00的发言：
这道题，逻辑的大大NN lawyer_1有过阐述。我觉得他讲的肯定是对的，因为经过其他无数大大NN的验证。C就说明“样本具有代表性”,所以是支持。
有吗?mm能不能给个连接
谢谢
作者: babycake 时间: 2007-9-6 18:15
http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=24&ID=80228
作者: yjwright 时间: 2007-9-6 21:26
orthopedists are concerned about possibly having misjudged the stability of the fracture. When number of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, however, all the fractures that had initially been judged stable were found to have healed correctly. Therefore, it is a waste of money to order follow-up x-rays of ankle fracture initially judged stable.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
B. Many ankle injuries for which an initial x-ray is ordered are revealed by the x-ray not to involve any fracture of the ankle.
C. X-rays of patients of many different orthopedists working in several hospitals were reviewed.
这题越看越有意思. 把我的想法跟大家分享一下:
B: 我觉得可以理解为: X-Ray was ordered for many ankle injuries. (Later, ) X-Ray revealed that there was no fracture of the ankle.
如果这种理解是正确的(请战友们鉴定), 那么第一个X-Ray说得是initial, 第二个就是review X-Ray了. 也就是说review X-ray没发现骨折, 也就是都好了?
作者: qoolazy 时间: 2007-9-6 21:42
这题已经讨论过N久了...答案已经是没有疑问的了....选C....大家即使对他有看法也表拿自己的分数来看玩笑啊
作者: myamanda 时间: 2007-9-6 22:29
哈哈，表理gwd了，他也可能犯错误啊~~
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |