ChaseDream

标题: OG_10_212, 过去分词引导状语从句 [打印本页]

作者: GMMBA 时间: 2007-9-5 11:07
标题: OG_10_212, 过去分词引导状语从句

The Baldrick Manufacturing Company has for

several years followed a policy aimed at decreasing operating costs and improving the efficiency of its distribution system.

(A) aimed at decreasing operating costs and improving

(B) aimed at the decreasing of operating costs and to improve

(C) aiming at the decreasing of operating costs and improving

(D) the aim of which is the decreasing of operating
costs and improving

(E) with the aim to decrease operating costs and to
improve

为什么选aimed引导状语从句，可以吗？

作者: GMMBA 时间: 2007-9-6 10:03
up

作者: elinaqu 时间: 2007-9-6 11:52

请教LZ，这里为什么说是壮语从句啊？

我这题的思路就是平行啊，B,C,D不平行首先排除，E选项with the aim... improve can easily be construed as referring to the Baldrick Manufacturing Company and so does not refer unequivocally to policy. 容易产生”那个公司带着…的目的”的修饰歧义。所以选A

(A) aimed at decreasing operating costs and improving

(B) aimed at the decreasing of operating costs and to improve

(C) aiming at the decreasing of operating costs and improving

(D) the aim of which is the decreasing of operating costs and improving

(E) with the aim to decrease operating costs and to improve

aimed at紧接着名词policy，修饰policy

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-9-6 11:56:34编辑过]

作者: dingxiang 时间: 2007-9-6 11:55
a policy 不可能自己 aiming 的,肯定是人制定这个policy , 所以人是aiming, policy是被动aimed

作者: GMMBA 时间: 2007-9-6 14:51

to elinaqu：

aimed at decreasing and improving, 好像是decrease/improve平行.

作者: GMMBA 时间: 2007-9-6 14:54

to dingxiang,

是否可以用aiming 来修饰前面has followed for many years a policy?

感觉这样意思更清晰。

作者: elinaqu 时间: 2007-9-6 15:54

以下是引用GMMBA在2007-9-6 14:51:00的发言：

to elinaqu：

aimed at decreasing and improving, 好像是decrease/improve平行.

就是decreasing 和improving平行

作者: elaine1031 时间: 2009-7-3 02:30
up

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)