ChaseDream

标题: 大全-10-14 大全-11-6 [打印本页]

作者: antoine 时间: 2003-11-28 21:13
标题: 大全-10-14 大全-11-6
19. Industrialists from the country Distopia were
accused of promoting the Distopian intervention in
the Arcadian civil war merely to insure that the
industrialists' facilities in Arcadia made substantial
profits during the war. Yet this cannot be the motive
since, as the Distopians foresaw, Distopia's federal
expenses for the intervention were eight billion
dollars, whereas, during the war, profits from the
Distopian industrialists’ facilities in Arcadia totaled
only four billion dollars.

Which of the following, if true, exposes a serious
flaw in the argument made in the second sentence
above?

(A) During the Arcadian war, many Distopian
industrialists with facilities located in Arcadia
experienced a significant rise in productivity
in their facilities located in Distopia
(B) The largest proportion of Distopia's federal
expenses is borne by those who receive no
significant industrial profits.
(C) Most Distopian industrialists' facilities located
in Arcadia are expected to maintain the level
of profits they achieved during the war.

(D) Distopian industrialists' facilities in Arcadia
made substantial profits before the events
that triggered the civil war.
(E) Many Distopians expressed concern over the
suffering that Arcadians underwent during
the civil war.

Answer  b
但我怎么觉得B像一个支持而不是反对啊？

SECTION 11- 6
6. F: We ought not to test the safety of new drugs on
  sentient animals, such as dogs and rabbits. Our
  benefit means their pain, and they are equal to
  us in the capacity to feel pain.

G: We must carry out such tests; otherwise, we
  would irresponsibly sacrifice the human lives
  that could have been saved by the drugs.

Which of the following, if true, is the best objection
that could be made from F's point of view to coun-
ter G's point?
(A) Even though it is not necessary for people to
use cosmetics, cosmetics are also being tested
on sentient animals.
(B) Medical science already has at its disposal a
great number of drugs and other treatments
for serious illnesses.
(C) It is not possible to obtain scientifically ade-
quate results by testing drugs in the test tube,
without making tests on living tissue.
(D) Some of the drugs to be tested would save
human beings from great pain.
(E) Many tests now performed on sentient animals
can be performed equally well on fertilized
chicken eggs that are at a very early stage of
development.

ANSWER E
为什么A 不对啊？
E只是说了MANY，并没有说ALL的TEST啊！

作者: mariezhu 时间: 2003-11-29 09:57
Are you sure that the answer to question No.19 is B? I'm a little bit surprised! I think it should be C. Since although during the war this facilities produced only four billion dollars profits,which cannot make up the expenditures for their preservation, it can be foreseen that they, without being destroyed in the war, would continue to function and make new profits after the war.

In regard to question No.6, be sure that you understand the question which asks you to find an opposition based on F's point to conter G's point. "is the best objection
that could be made from f's point of view to counter g's point?"
F does not agree to test drugs on sentient animals.

作者: antoine 时间: 2003-11-29 15:16
我又查了遍答案，真的是B。我也是想不通才到这里来请教大家的嘛！哪位给个高见啊？

作者: cranberry 时间: 2003-11-29 15:51
答案就应该是B.因为文中指出国家的花费超过商人们的收入,因此,利润不是商人们的动机,政府也就更不可能被商人们鼓动因此干涉他国的内战.B说明商人的利润和国家的收入是不相关的,国家花费巨大而商人得利,因此,这个对动机的否定是站不住脚的.而C的不足在于,即使商人的动机在于此后的获利,它还是没有解释原文中用国家支出和企业获利来衡量得失的缺陷.

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-11-29 15:52:12编辑过]

作者: mariezhu 时间: 2003-11-29 17:37
明白你的意思，不过B似乎weaken的是 the fact that "industrialists from the country istopia were accused of promoting the distopian intervention in the arcadian civil war merely to insure that the industrialists' facilities in arcadia made substantial profits during the war"，

这道题应该怎么理解问题中说到的which of the following, if true, exposes a serious flaw in the ARGUMENT MADE IN THE SECOND SENTENCE ABOVE? 这里有关系么？是针对整段的weaken还是针对第二句中的解释weaken？

请赐教，先谢过....

作者: cranberry 时间: 2003-11-29 18:41
第一句根本没有作出结论，何来weakean?

作者: antoine 时间: 2003-11-29 21:58
谢谢你的解释，我觉得已经是很清楚了。我再重复以便，你看看对不对。商人的PROFIT是4BILLIONS，因为FEDERAL EXPENSES不是由这些在A国有利益的人出的，所以就算FEDERAL出的钱再少或是再多也是对那些在A 有利益的商人有利的。B表达的就是这个意思是吗？

作者: tempture 时间: 2004-11-15 14:24
这里问的是大全-10-19，要是能够改一下名字就好了，方便搜索

作者: boborich 时间: 2005-10-5 13:43
对第二句话的weaken就是对第一句话的support

作者: 向上爬的猪 时间: 2006-12-1 10:25

B不对,

干涉别国内政的经费来源于那些没有在A国获利的人,说明:

1,干涉行为不是为了利,加强而不是WEAKEN结论.或者

2,想获利而由于经营不好,才没获利,WEAKEN结论.

要按哪个思路分析,题中没有明确的指示.

C比较好,

虽然干涉中是没有挣到大钱,但至少以后的好日子都是由于战争中的干涉行为造成的.

作者: scarlett8327 时间: 2009-3-22 11:33

困惑ING...

作者: Dongkailun 时间: 2011-8-12 16:56
支出8，得到4，所以我没有得利。削弱就是说支出的8里面最大部分是由不从那4里面得利的人承担的。所以那8里面的那些人你愿意支付多少和我继续在A战争中里面得利无关系。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)