ChaseDream

标题: OG10_Q100,请教. [打印本页]

作者: GMMBA 时间: 2007-9-3 11:16
标题: OG10_Q100,请教.

Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have

begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.

(A) prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings

(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills

(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

Choice C is the best answer. Either of the following constructions would be idiomatic here: x forbids y to do z or x prohibits y from doing
z. Choices A and B violate idiom;

\ D and E introduce constructions that, in context, are faulty. First of all, both bans that x cannot be done and bans that y cannot do x are unidiomatic formulations. Secondly, the negative cannot after bans is illogical.

1,划线部分的解释不太理解，为什么ban后面不能有cannot,是不是只能放should?

2,像这种颁布act, bill, ban的后面，表达他们的作用，感觉用现在分词引导伴随状语比从句好一些，

这有什么理论基础吗？

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-9-3 11:16:19编辑过]

作者: GMMBA 时间: 2007-9-4 14:28

help!

作者: dudulee 时间: 2007-9-4 21:35

主动语态优于被动语态，prohibit。。。from

作者: GMMBA 时间: 2007-9-4 23:28

不明白，继续问。

作者: GMMBA 时间: 2007-9-5 11:08
up

作者: GMMBA 时间: 2007-9-6 10:03
up

作者: elinaqu 时间: 2007-9-6 12:05

prohibit 不能用 can not 代替,不能和禁止在意思上有很大差别,禁止就是禁止，不是能不能的能力问题。

很多法规禁令的题，ETS是倾向用分词修饰的

为了保险起见，这题建议先用x prohibits y from doing z排除

作者: GMMBA 时间: 2007-9-6 14:59
一个问题，prohibiting这里是修饰ban还是前面整句话？？

作者: elinaqu 时间: 2007-9-6 15:48

以下是引用GMMBA在2007-9-6 14:59:00的发言：
一个问题，prohibiting这里是修饰ban还是前面整句话？？

修饰ban

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)