ChaseDream

标题: Feifei-45,没有搜索到讨论贴 [打印本页]

作者: wishful_way 时间: 2007-9-2 04:29
标题: Feifei-45,没有搜索到讨论贴

45.Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall of a billion dollars in the coming fiscal year. Since there is no feasible way to increase the available funds, our only choice is to decrease expenditures. The plan before you outlines feasible cuts that would yield savings of a billion dollars over the coming fiscal year. We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore, only if we adopt this plan.

This reasoning in the commissioner’s argument is flawed because this argument

(A) relies on information that is far from certain

(B) confuses being an adequate solution with being a required solution

(D) inappropriately employs language that is vague

(E) takes for granted that there is no way to increase available funds

答案是B，这种属于什么类型的题呢

弱弱的问一句怎么分辨adequate solution 和 required solution

我选的是E。。。期待NN的解答，谢谢先！

作者: wishful_way 时间: 2007-9-2 17:14

怎么没人看啊～55

作者: Whitney 时间: 2007-9-3 03:50
an adequate solution (Sufficient);
a required solution (Necessary)

"decrease expenditures" is necessary for balancing burget, but may be NOT sufficient. Why? Because "decrease expenditures" could lead to decrease the income revenue.

作者: zijing4546 时间: 2007-9-3 20:30
补充一下，我感觉E属于推翻前提，逻辑题里不可以把人家的前提推翻的

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)