ChaseDream

标题: 大全-20-16 [打印本页]

作者: browse    时间: 2003-11-28 11:57
标题: 大全-20-16
Which of the following, if true, is the most logical completion of the argument below?
The tax system of the Republic of Grootland encourages borrowing by granting its taxpayers tax relief for interest paid on loans. The system also discourages saving by taxing any interest earned on savings. Nevertheless, it is clear that Grootland’s tax system does not consistently favor borrowing over saving, for if it did, there would be no______
(A) tax relief in Grootland for those portions of a taxpayer’s income, if any, that are set aside to increase that taxpayer’s total savings
(B) tax relief in Grootland for the processing fees that taxpayers pay to lending institutions when obtaining certain kinds of loans
(C) tax relief in Grootland for interest that taxpayers are charged on the unpaid balance in credit card accounts E
(D) taxes due in Grootland on the cash value of gifts received by taxpayers from banks trying to encourage people to open savings accounts
(E) taxes due in Grootland on the amount that a taxpayer has invested in interest-bearing savings accounts

没学过财务,懂的同学翻译一下大意好不?


作者: 深海的小美人鱼    时间: 2003-11-28 12:48
大意是说某地税务系统鼓励借钱不鼓励存钱.但是其实此地的税务系统并非一直如此,即并非鼓励借钱而不鼓励存钱,否则的话,纳税人存钱获利息的时候不应该纳税. 其实就是说还是希望用户存钱, 不然哪里;来的税收呢?.


[此贴子已经被作者于2003-11-28 12:53:14编辑过]

作者: browse    时间: 2003-11-28 13:18
答案是A,前面的意思理解了,但A还是不明白什么意思,能不能讲得清梦点?
作者: jandj_shanghai    时间: 2003-11-28 14:11
句子大意是鼓励借钱borrowing, credit,不鼓励存钱saving
后面说如果政策一致的话,则。。。there would be no ...
反正转来转去就是要你找(加上there would be no)和前面半句一致的选项。
A是说no tax relief for income whice increases savings

作者: seanql    时间: 2003-11-29 00:14
可以将if it.... there would be no解为问“it is clear that Grootland’s tax system does not consistently favor borrowing over saving”的weaken,自然就是作出的鼓励存而不鼓励借的行为了。




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3