Q19:
In Rubaria, excellent health care is available to virtually the entire population, whereas very few people in Terland receive adequate medical care. Yet, although the death rate for most diseases is higher in Terland than in Rubaria, the percentage of the male population that dies from prostate cancer is significantly higher in Rubaria than in Terland.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the disparity between the prostate cancer death rate in Rubaria and Terland?
A. Effective treatment of prostate cancer in its early stages generally requires medical techniques available in Rubaria but not in Terland.
B. Most men who have prostate cancer are older than the average life expectancy for male inhabitants of Terland.
C. Being in poor general health does not increase one’s risk of developing prostate cancer.
我選C 答案是B
之前有討論過了 但是沒有個結果
盼望指教
c. Being in poor general health does not increase one’s risk of developing prostate cancer.
not increase does not mean decrease
我觉得这几个选项都有问题，
选项里至少应该出现两个国家之间的比较才能得出比较的结果。
像B， 即便想各位解释的那样，早早死翘翘， 那如果s国也是这样的情况呢，而且推理加入了外界的因素，
不过最优只能选B看来，
choose b
得P病的人通常一般都是年龄到一定境界的，而T国的人因为医疗不好评均达不到那个年龄所以就因P病死亡的少
问题是题目更本没有讨论年龄问题啊，一般来说没有讨论的因素不应该涉及的……
C反而比较和题目相关，虽然好像也没说明白什么。
明白了
Most men who have prostate cancer are older than the average life expectancy for male inhabitants of Terland.
意思大概是这样的，T的男的大约可以活到50岁就去世了，而R的男一般可以活到60岁以后，也就是说,T的男的去到50就会因为其它疾病死了，而不是死于P CANCER；而R的男的到60以后都没死于其它疾病，其它疾病都要不了他们的命，反而P CANCER成为了杀手。
就是说如果医疗条件都一样的话，60岁以后可能癌症死亡率是一样的。解释了原因
Being in poor general health does not increase one’s risk of developing prostate cancer.
虽然不会增加癌症，但也并不能说明为什么R的癌症死亡率高啊？最多就是2个国家都一样。
问题是题目更本没有讨论年龄问题啊，一般来说没有讨论的因素不应该涉及的……
C反而比较和题目相关，虽然好像也没说明白什么。
C的being poor本文根本就没提到，而且医疗条件差也推理不出来being poor 所以无关
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |