ChaseDream

标题: 补充250题中60 [打印本页]

作者: liuxuejunjx 时间: 2003-11-27 17:46
标题: 补充250题中60
60. Studies show that young people with higher-than-average blood pressure and their families have a history of high blood pressure are more likely than others to develop a severe form of the condition. ???

(A) and their families have a history of high blood pressure
(B) whose families have a history of high blood pressure
(C) and a history of high blood pressure runs in the family
(D) whose families have a history of high blood pressure running in them
(E) with a history of high blood pressure running in their family
答案为B，我选A
觉得两个修饰成分用and连接更为合理

作者: linlin315 时间: 2003-11-27 21:10
我认为答案是B
看A整句话的句子结构
studies show that young people with...+and+句子+are more..than..
明显的句子的结构有问题，所以A是错的。

作者: caterpillar 时间: 2004-1-27 04:37
想再问一下，这里whose引导的定语从句不就不符合就近修饰的原则了？

作者: 4yuan 时间: 2004-1-27 13:00
原则要灵活运用，这里whose很明显是修饰前面的人，所以不就近也不会混淆

作者: oliviachen 时间: 2004-2-29 14:54
为什么后面不能加running in them？谢谢

作者: davidzhn 时间: 2004-8-18 23:55

我觉得young people with a history of high blood pressure runs in the family逻辑有问题

应该是 family 有 history ..

作者: greyskyblue6 时间: 2006-12-25 17:04

E 有什么问题么?

not effective?

作者: ustchero 时间: 2007-9-19 20:14

我觉得ABCDE五个选项都有问题

A；and之前为短语，and之后为句子，unparallel

B：whose有修饰blood presure之嫌

C：and之前为短语，and之后为句子，unparallel；而且history..runs不合逻辑

D：whose有修饰blood presure之嫌，且running修饰blood presure不合逻辑

E：with+with，显得累赘，且第二个with有修饰前面的blood presure之嫌，且running修饰blood presure不合逻辑

这题只能差中选优，欢迎拍砖

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)