ChaseDream

标题: LSAT-1-2-7 [打印本页]

作者: qierliu 时间: 2003-11-27 12:43
标题: lsat1 cr2-7
7. A recent survey showed that many workers in a certain company are dissatisfied with their jobs. The survey also showed that most of the dissatisfied workers believe that they have little control over their job assignments. Therefore, to increase workers job satisfaction the company’s management need only concentrate on changing workers’ beliefs regarding the degree of control they have over their job assignments.

Which one of the following, if also shown by the survey, would most seriously call into question the conclusion made by the author of the passage?

(A) The dissatisfied workers feel that their wages are too low and working conditions are unsatisfactory.

(B) The number of workers in the company who are satisfied with their jobs is greater than the number who are dissatisfied.

(C) The workers in the company are more dissatisfied than workers in other companies

(D) Most people in company management believe that the workers already have too much control over their work.

(E) The workers in the company who are satisfied with their jobs believe that they have a lot of control over their job assignments.

我觉得A与此题目不相关啊，D为什么不对呢

作者: 云淡风轻 时间: 2003-11-27 14:22
这道题问：如果survey中出现何结果，可以weaken此题的结论？

首先要清楚题干的结论是Therefore之后的话，是如何提高工人的job satisfaction？结论是：only focus on changing workers' belief regarding the degree of control。

所以要weaken就有两个方向：一个直接说increase degree of control不行；另一个间接说除了degree of control的问题之外还有其他问题，言下之意说"only focus on degree of control"其实也不能提高job satisfaction。正确选项A说的就是后者：就是工资和工作环境也都不行，意即weaken了结论。

作者: 云淡风轻 时间: 2003-11-27 14:27
标题: LSAT-1-2-7
D选项脱离了结论，而且“经理层认为有control”不代表真的有，没有weaken结论的作用。
一般选项里含有“believe/think"等主观词的选项几乎不可能为正确选项，因为不代表客观。

作者: dphxmg 时间: 2005-3-26 21:39

The flawed reasoning of the stimulus argument is that two things happen at the same time so there must be causal relationship between both.

To attack such reasoning, there are at least three strategies available to us:

(1)The arguer inverts the causal relationship;

(2)The arguer ingnores the possibility that there is another thing that is the reason for both things;

(3)Both things don't related to each other at all.

作者: xjlv128 时间: 2006-3-15 17:53

哎，偶居然选b！完全是无关选项嘛

作者: ky86 时间: 2006-8-30 15:09

ding.

作者: fredshen 时间: 2006-8-31 00:55
This one is more about mistaken reversal than C/E relationship. Dont overthink. This is a flaw question by the way.

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-8-31 0:57:00编辑过]

作者: ebrain1 时间: 2006-9-9 22:32

他因削弱

作者: Bensontuo 时间: 2019-3-26 21:29

qierliu 发表于 2003-11-27 12:43
7. A recent survey showed that many workers in a certain company are dissatisfied with their jobs. T ...

兩件不相關的事情是沒有所謂的因果關係的, 所以只要答案影射, 有其他原因讓員工不開心, 我們就不能夠說讓員工控制自己的工作, 他們會很開心。

舉個例子

ＮＢＡ所有隊伍的後衛們都在季後賽之前都做了問卷調查, 而所有的不滿意聯盟目前的運作環境的後衛們對於聯盟裡裁判的吹判尺度都很無力且認為其有偏袒成份在, 所以, 只要這些不滿意聯盟的後衛們能夠看到聯盟對於裁判吹判尺度的公正之改進, 這些後衛就會開心。

幹, 要是不滿意的這些後衛不爽的原因是因為拿不到球勒？因為教練白痴不給進攻機會勒？因為隊友是豬頭三分線亂射勒？甚至是因為自己經紀人他媽的不會談判合約所以拿不到肥爽合約金勒？

不滿意的原因可能有很多種, 但是絕對不可能是因為一個不滿意的原因就完完全全的是決定因素

他因削弱聽起來繞口

我比較喜歡 - 藉口強辯

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)