Some who favor putting governmental enterprises into privete hands suggest that conservation objectives would in general be better served if private environmental groups were put in charges of operating and financing the national park systems, which is now run by the government.
Which of the following, assuming that it is a realistic possibility, argues most strongly against the suggestion above?
A. Those seeking to abolish all restrictions on exploiting the natural resources of the parks might join the private environmental groups as members and eventually take over their leadership.
B. Private environmental groups might not always agree on the best ways to achieve conservation objectives.
答案是A，可是我觉得B选项怎么不对了？求助。。。
题目要求most strongly against
A的结果比B更坏：those seeking to abolish all restrictions on exploiting the natural resources一旦取得领导权，就可能abolish all restrictions on exploiting the natural resources.
而B的结果最多不过是not always agree on the best ways to achieve the goal (conservation objectives).
你再想一想。
我终于遇到了一个跟我复习同一种资料的人了。以后多交流吧。
watermoon07，
你好~是不是B选项中说private environmental groups用的不是best way，但并没有反驳to achieve the goal,所以并不是“most strongly against”，这么理解对吗？
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |