ChaseDream

标题: OG10-39 [打印本页]

作者: snowmary    时间: 2007-8-18 22:59
标题: OG10-39

39. For members of the seventeenth-century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment, a method to protect warriors against enemy arrows and spears.

(A)  a method to protect

(B)  as a method protecting

(C)  protecting

(D)  as a protection of

(E)  to protect

      想问问E,OG的解释是Choice E is incomplete; used to protect would have been acceptable.为什么to do不能直接表示equipment的目的呢?


作者: niswzzhn    时间: 2007-8-19 00:26
个人意见,不是NN,动词ing形式可以指带前面的一个句子,所以特别倾向于用。
作者: crowkiller    时间: 2007-8-19 00:34

不定式不能单独在句末逗号后面做状语。

起码在GMAT里面没有看到这样正确的例子。


作者: snowmary    时间: 2007-8-19 08:27

那如果没有逗号,用to protect直接修饰equipment可不可以?


作者: margaret1970    时间: 2007-8-19 09:17

i think that even if there is no comma,to+v  couldn't be used here.

because just in the construction of v ...+ to+v, to+v inducates a perpose.

but here be ..+to+v indicates that someone plan to do somothing or something will happen


作者: lpdeng    时间: 2009-11-1 01:26
以下是引用snowmary在2007/8/18 22:59:00的发言:

39. For members of the seventeenth-century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment, a method to protect warriors against enemy arrows and spears.

(A)  a method to protect

(B)  as a method protecting

(C)  protecting

(D)  as a protection of

(E)  to protect

      想问问E,OG的解释是Choice E is incomplete; used to protect would have been acceptable.为什么to do不能直接表示equipment的目的呢?

1) , to do 永远错!(mahhatan GMAT的人说"We can't use an infinitive after the comma. Remember that an infinitive functions as a verb, but we're trying to introduce a modifying clause here to provide further information about the military equipment.”)

2) 就算这里去掉逗号,前面名词太多, 哪个才是to do 的逻辑主语呢?

3) 好像又看到nn说, 如果是 used to protect 就可以。 相当于 used 短语修饰前面的items,  to do 是 used的固定搭配。

说错了请大家指教。 






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3