ChaseDream

标题: 885 sec e, 17 [打印本页]

作者: fufu 时间: 2003-11-26 15:29
标题: 885 sec e, 17
17. Kansas Republican Nancy Kassebaum, one of only two women in the U.S. Senate in 1992, said she did not so much wish for more women senators but more moderate Republican ones.
(A) did not so much wish for more women senators but more moderate Republican ones
(B) wished not so much for more senators who were women than moderate Republicans
(C) did not wish so much for more women senators as for more moderate Republicans
(D) did not wish for more women senators so much as moderate Republicans
(E) wished for more senators who are moderate Republicans than women

作者: rabbitbug 时间: 2003-11-26 17:04
这道题选C , 不知道你的问题是什么. 试着说明一下,看看是否还有问题. 从原文的意思, 作者想表达的是Nancy希望有更多的moderate republican senators,而不是更多的women senators, 在表达上可以用not...but并列,也可以用so...as 并列,但是,必须保证并列的完整性,即not for...but for..., 或so ....for... as for..., 这里for不可省略.答案中任何冗赘表达,如:senators who were women,都应换成women senators, 另外, 要遵循原意,不能将republican senators 改为 republincans, 两者的意义不同.

作者: fufu 时间: 2003-11-26 17:15
now i got it la..overlook the "for"... tks goodi...

作者: 深海的小美人鱼 时间: 2003-11-26 19:28
fufu好象应该把答案贴出来么.
这样便于讨论.虽然都做过了.但是经常很多人还是没做过的.
而且好象你还有一个问题也是没说你到底问什么.这样别人怎么知道你什么地方不明白呢,

作者: yuying6239 时间: 2005-3-30 15:34
关于此题，那个 wish可以直接否定吗？例如wished not 而不是did not wish

作者: yuying6239 时间: 2005-3-30 15:52
rabbitbug 讲的好明白！！

作者: jiangjun 时间: 2005-9-1 17:51

如果D改成

(D) did not wish for more women senators so much as for moderate Republicans

可以吗？如果可以，C、D哪个好？

作者: weichenli 时间: 2005-10-9 00:58

if you add "for" for choice D, it would be grammatically correct.

However, C is still better since "so much" in C modifies " wish"

my opinion~open to discussion

作者: yy628 时间: 2006-6-22 10:04
这句是不是考not so much as这个考点？

作者: huoduoduo 时间: 2006-11-22 15:55

同意　rabbitbug

作者: luckypf99 时间: 2007-2-10 05:23
但是C将republican senators 改为 republincans了啊，我正是由于这个才排除了C。不明白！

作者: swmoon 时间: 2007-6-23 01:48

what's wrong with E?

anyone can tell me? thanks

作者: swmoon 时间: 2007-6-27 02:20
UP

作者: swmoon 时间: 2007-6-27 02:24

(E) wished for more senators who are moderate Republicans than women (senators)

here, can senators be omitted in order to make a parallel structure? then, senators who are moderate Republicans and women senators are compared. so i choose E. what's wrong with it?

作者: swmoon 时间: 2007-6-27 23:38
up~ 555

作者: swmoon 时间: 2007-7-3 03:36
why does no one answer me?

作者: leo-liu 时间: 2008-5-24 10:30

以下是引用swmoon在2007-6-27 2:24:00的发言：

(E) wished for more senators who are moderate Republicans than women (senators)

here, can senators be omitted in order to make a parallel structure? then, senators who are moderate Republicans and women senators are compared. so i choose E. what's wrong with it?

it seems ok, i also picked the answer E. After reading C again, I find the idiom "not so ... as..." is much better.

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)