标题: A or B 谓语动词用生么？OG不解 [打印本页] 作者: BetterMan 时间: 2003-11-26 02:06 标题: A or B 谓语动词用生么？OG不解 按照og下面的解释， there is little water or services available 的谓语动词应该是 are?
107. Downzoning, zoning that typically results in the reduction of housing density, allows for more open space in areas where little water or services exist. A. little water or services exist B. little water or services exists C. few services and little water exists D. there is little water or services available E. there are few services and little available water The adjective little modifies "mass nouns" (e.g., water), which refer to some undifferentiated quantity; the adjective few modifies "count nouns" (e.g., services), which refer to groups made up of distinct members that can be considered individually. Hence, choices A, B, and D are incorrect because little cannot properly modify services. Also, since water and services are being discussed as a pair, they should logically be treated as a compound subject requiring a plural verb; thus, the singular verbs exists (in B and C) and is (in D) are wrong. Choice E is best: the plural verb are is used, and few correctly modifies services. 作者: g4yLee 时间: 2003-11-26 02:17
little 不能修饰 services
看这个句子: there is little water and few services available, 谓语动词由靠近的water决定,所以is. 但是,实际英语中,are也是可以的,而gmat更提倡靠近原则.
[此贴子已经被作者于2003-11-26 2:17:45编辑过]
作者: BetterMan 时间: 2003-11-26 02:25
Thanks! But still have some confusion.
According to what has been presented in OG's explanation " Also, since water and services are being discussed as a pair, they should logically be treated as a compound subject requiring a plural verb; thus, the singular verbs exists (in B and C) and is (in D) are wrong. "
Then the " is " in Choice D is wrong.?? Even though Choice D can be eliminated by another err: little services.