ChaseDream

标题: GWD-30-Q35-Q37 的答案 [打印本页]

作者: jay8418 时间: 2007-8-2 13:13
标题: GWD-30-Q35-Q37 的答案

请教各位这篇阅读的答案, 谢谢了

GWD-30-Q35-Q37

(The following was excerpted frommaterial written in 1988.)

      For over a decade the
       most common policy advice
       given to developing countries
Line
                                    by international development
(5)      institutions has been to copy
the export-oriented path of the
newly industrializing countries,
the celebrated NIC’s. These
economies—Brazil, Hong
(10)      Kong, Mexico, Singapore,
South Korea, and Taiwan—
burst into the world manufac-
turing market in the late 1960’s
and the 1970’s; by 1978 these
(15)      six economies, along with India,
enjoyed unequaled growth
rates for gross national product
and for exports, with exports
accounting for 70 percent of
(20)      the developing world’s manu-
       factured exports. It was,
       therefore, not surprising that
dozens of other countries
attempted to follow their model,
(25)      yet no countries—with the pos-
sible exceptions of Malaysia
and Thailand—have even
approached their success. In
“No More NIC’s,” Robin Broad
(30)      and John Cavanagh search for
the reasons behind these fail-
ures, identifying far-reaching
       changes in the global econ-
omy—from synthetic substitutes
(35)
                                        for commodity exports to
unsustainable levels of foreign
debt—as responsible for a glut
economy offering little room for
      new entrants. Despite these
(40)     changes, the authors maintain,
the World Bank and the Inter-
national Monetary Fund—the
foremost international devel-
opment institutions—have
(45)      continued to promote the NIC
path as the way for heavily
indebted developing countries
to proceed. And yet the futility
of this approach should,
(50)      according to the authors, be
all too apparent so many years
into a period of reduced growth
in world markets.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q35:
Given the information in the passage, which of the following is a true statement about the NIC’s?
1. Their economic success among developing countries has been exceeded only by the successes of Malaysia and Thailand.
2. By 1978 they produced 70 percent of the world’s manufactured exports.
3. In the late 1970’s, their growth rates for gross national product were among the highest in the world.
4. In recent years their development has been heavily subsidized by major international development institutions.
5. They received conflicting policy advice from international development institutions in the late 1960’s and the 1970’s.
Answer:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q36:
The author of the passage most clearly implies that Broad and Cavanagh disagree with the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund about which of the following?
1. The ways in which the global economy has changed in recent years
2. The causes of the unsustainable levels of foreign debt that the developing countries have incurred in recent years
3. The level of foreign debt that should be maintained by developing countries
4. The degree to which international development institutions should monitor the growth of developing countries
5. The degree to which heavily indebted developing countries should emphasize exports in their overall economic strategy
Answer:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q37:
The author mentions Malaysia and Thailand in order to
1. acknowledge the appearance of implausibility in a broad claim
2. concede the possible existence of counter-examples to a generalization
3. offer additional evidence in support of a disputed conclusion
4. illustrate the broad applicability of a hypothesis
5. admit the limited scope of a standard analysis
Answer:

      For over a decade the
       most common policy advice
       given to developing countries
Line
                    by international development
(5)      institutions has been to copy
the export-oriented path of the
newly industrializing countries,
the celebrated NIC’s. These
economies—Brazil, Hong
(10)      Kong, Mexico, Singapore,
South Korea, and Taiwan—
burst into the world manufac-
turing market in the late 1960’s
and the 1970’s; by 1978 these
(15)      six economies, along with India,
enjoyed unequaled growth
rates for gross national product
and for exports, with exports
accounting for 70 percent of
(20)      the developing world’s manu-
       factured exports. It was,
       therefore, not surprising that
dozens of other countries
attempted to follow their model,
(25)      yet no countries—with the pos-
sible exceptions of Malaysia
and Thailand—have even
approached their success. In
“No More NIC’s,” Robin Broad
(30)      and John Cavanagh search for
the reasons behind these fail-
ures, identifying far-reaching
       changes in the global econ-
omy—from synthetic substitutes
(35)
                        for commodity exports to
unsustainable levels of foreign
debt—as responsible for a glut
economy offering little room for
      new entrants. Despite these
(40)     changes, the authors maintain,
the World Bank and the Inter-
national Monetary Fund—the
foremost international devel-
opment institutions—have
(45)      continued to promote the NIC
path as the way for heavily
indebted developing countries
to proceed. And yet the futility
of this approach should,
(50)      according to the authors, be
all too apparent so many years
into a period of reduced growth
in world markets.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q35:
Given the information in the passage, which of the following is a true statement about the NIC’s?
1. Their economic success among developing countries has been exceeded only by the successes of Malaysia and Thailand.
2. By 1978 they produced 70 percent of the world’s manufactured exports.
3. In the late 1970’s, their growth rates for gross national product were among the highest in the world.
4. In recent years their development has been heavily subsidized by major international development institutions.
5. They received conflicting policy advice from international development institutions in the late 1960’s and the 1970’s.
Answer:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q36:
The author of the passage most clearly implies that Broad and Cavanagh disagree with the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund about which of the following?
1. The ways in which the global economy has changed in recent years
2. The causes of the unsustainable levels of foreign debt that the developing countries have incurred in recent years
3. The level of foreign debt that should be maintained by developing countries
4. The degree to which international development institutions should monitor the growth of developing countries
5. The degree to which heavily indebted developing countries should emphasize exports in their overall economic strategy
Answer:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q37:
The author mentions Malaysia and Thailand in order to
1. acknowledge the appearance of implausibility in a broad claim
2. concede the possible existence of counter-examples to a generalization
3. offer additional evidence in support of a disputed conclusion
4. illustrate the broad applicability of a hypothesis
5. admit the limited scope of a standard analysis
Answer:

作者: finger1234 时间: 2008-8-13 23:07
35 c __unequaled 36 E indebted 37 B possible exception

作者: alibaba_2009 时间: 2009-8-3 16:24
DING

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)