ChaseDream
标题: GWD-2-3 头晕啊,大牛帮忙 [打印本页]
作者: howcoolya 时间: 2007-7-24 16:11
标题: GWD-2-3 头晕啊,大牛帮忙
GWD 2-3
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were not to be concluded.
- is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were
- is expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal was
- is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement be signed by them with a provision for penalties if the deal were
- are expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until it signs a merger agreement with a provision for penalties included if the deal was
- are expected to be making an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal were
D和E排除没什么话好说,但是ABC三个选项就有点晕了。
我也看出了the deal were是虚拟语气,但是A和C之间很难选择,即使选了C(正确答案),我也不明白为什么中间有个be
作者: crowkiller 时间: 2007-7-24 17:14
这道题是争议A和C。
个人觉得应该选A。
C 里面的signed by them 感觉不爽。
Open to discuss............
作者: diyin 时间: 2007-7-24 17:22
个人觉得A最大障碍在a merger agreement is signed that includes ,that必须紧随修饰的名词。并且include在GMAC的题目中基本上是including的形式出现,that include wordy.
本题为什么用虚拟语气比较难判断,只能用排除法来作。
作者: crowkiller 时间: 2007-7-24 17:31
以下是引用diyin在2007-7-24 17:22:00的发言:个人觉得A最大障碍在a merger agreement is signed that includes ,that必须紧随修饰的名词。并且include在GMAC的题目中基本上是including的形式出现,that include wordy.
本题为什么用虚拟语气比较难判断,只能用排除法来作。
that 从句在有些情况下是可以跳跃修饰的,OG10SCth里面也有这样的例子。(主要是为了防止头重脚轻,在主语的定语从句过长,而谓语宾语较短的情况下出现)
建议LZ看一下置顶帖子里面前人的讨论,已经很清楚了。。。
Open to discuss........
[此贴子已经被作者于2007-7-24 17:32:15编辑过]
作者: shero 时间: 2007-7-24 18:06
以下是引用crowkiller在2007-7-24 17:31:00的发言:that 从句在有些情况下是可以跳跃修饰的,OG10SCth里面也有这样的例子。(主要是为了防止头重脚轻,在主语的定语从句过长,而谓语宾语较短的情况下出现)
建议LZ看一下置顶帖子里面前人的讨论,已经很清楚了。。。
Open to discuss........
同意,这里that的修饰对象不会引起歧义
open to discuss
作者: howcoolya 时间: 2007-7-24 18:14
我也是看见by them,感觉不舒服把C 干掉的,但是答案偏偏是C。
我现在很想知道,GWD的答案究竟是谁做的,有没有权威性啊。别误人子弟啊
作者: diyin 时间: 2007-7-25 09:38
谢谢高手们! 那A的错误是否可以这样理解,if条件句的时态是有问题的,A的主句和if的时态不能对应。
作者: yubread 时间: 2007-7-28 02:53
C中主句用"IS expected", 从句用“signed by them” 是否是矛盾啊,主语应该是“one of the potential investors”,这个them指代不清。我推荐A
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |