ChaseDream

标题: 要考了!问:885- 补充-212 [打印本页]

作者: oldreaper    时间: 2003-11-24 11:01
标题: 要考了!问:885- 补充-212
Following the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger, investigators concluded that many key people employed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and its contractors work an excessive amount of overtime that has the potential of causing errors in judgment.
(A) overtime that has the potential of causing
(B) overtime that has the potential to cause
(C) overtime that potentially can cause
(D) overtime, a practice that has the potential for causing
(E) overtime, a practice that can, potentially, cause

why not D
作者: yzlinlin    时间: 2003-11-24 22:35
最不让ETS喜欢的缺点:不简洁。
作者: snowflower    时间: 2004-2-12 08:32
BTW,could you tell me why not C? THANKS
作者: 橙子    时间: 2004-2-12 08:35
"potentially can"redundancy?
作者: clevercat    时间: 2004-4-19 02:10

好象是potential to do something 吧?



作者: shaf    时间: 2004-8-9 20:49
c还有一个错误就是that前没逗号
作者: LISAYUAN750616    时间: 2004-8-10 10:01

不选B而选E是不是因为同位语优于定语从句。

请大家一定告诉我,谢了!


作者: numero    时间: 2004-8-21 17:11

不明白为什么不选D,


E中can和potentially应该是重复,在OG里有例子



159. While depressed property values can hurt some large investors, they are potentially devastating for home-owners, whose equity—in many cases representing a life’s savings—can plunge or even disappear.


(A) they are potentially devastating for homeowners, whose


(B) they can potentially devastate homeowners in that their


(C) for homeowners they are potentially devastating, because their


(D) for homeowners, it is potentially devastating in that their(A)


(E) it can potentially devastate homeowners, whose


Choice A is the best. Its wording is unambiguous and economical. The plural pronoun they agrees with its antecedent, property values. The pronoun whose clearly refers to homeowners and efficiently connects them with the idea of lost equity. In B, C, and D, substituting in that their or because their for whose is wordy and confusing since the antecedent of their might be they, not homeowners. Furthermore, can potentially is redundant in B and E. Both D and E use the singular pronoun it, which does not agree with its logical antecedent, property values.


作者: 携隐    时间: 2004-8-21 20:18
for doing是ETS最不喜欢的用法,每当这个时候通通变成do或to do。ETS在OG的解释中屡次说for doing是nonidiomatic
作者: rings    时间: 2004-9-23 14:00

that has the potential to cause修饰overtime不对


作者: 携隐    时间: 2004-9-23 15:20
以下是引用numero在2004-8-21 17:11:00的发言:

不明白为什么不选D,


E中can和potentially应该是重复,在OG里有例子





159. While depressed property values can hurt some large investors, they are potentially devastating for home-owners, whose equity—in many cases representing a life’s savings—can plunge or even disappear.


(A) they are potentially devastating for homeowners, whose


(B) they can potentially devastate homeowners in that their


(C) for homeowners they are potentially devastating, because their


(D) for homeowners, it is potentially devastating in that their(A)


(E) it can potentially devastate homeowners, whose


Choice A is the best. Its wording is unambiguous and economical. The plural pronoun they agrees with its antecedent, property values. The pronoun whose clearly refers to homeowners and efficiently connects them with the idea of lost equity. In B, C, and D, substituting in that their or because their for whose is wordy and confusing since the antecedent of their might be they, not homeowners. Furthermore, can potentially is redundant in B and E. Both D and E use the singular pronoun it, which does not agree with its logical antecedent, property values.





这个potentially是和can一起修饰devastating的,而一楼的那个potentailly是修饰can的.


这个ETS真是狡猾大大滴啊.


potentially的习惯用法是什么呢?? of doing还是to do???哪位NN告诉一声吧!谢谢啦.


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-9-23 15:22:23编辑过]

作者: rings    时间: 2004-10-7 20:56

顶一下,potentially 后加什么??


作者: gmatjh    时间: 2005-3-7 22:20
以下是引用numero在2004-8-21 17:11:00的发言:

不明白为什么不选D,


E中can和potentially应该是重复,在OG里有例子





159. While depressed property values can hurt some large investors, they are potentially devastating for home-owners, whose equity—in many cases representing a life’s savings—can plunge or even disappear.


(A) they are potentially devastating for homeowners, whose


(B) they can potentially devastate homeowners in that their


(C) for homeowners they are potentially devastating, because their


(D) for homeowners, it is potentially devastating in that their(A)


(E) it can potentially devastate homeowners, whose


Choice A is the best. Its wording is unambiguous and economical. The plural pronoun they agrees with its antecedent, property values. The pronoun whose clearly refers to homeowners and efficiently connects them with the idea of lost equity. In B, C, and D, substituting in that their or because their for whose is wordy and confusing since the antecedent of their might be they, not homeowners. Furthermore, can potentially is redundant in B and E. Both D and E use the singular pronoun it, which does not agree with its logical antecedent, property values.






同意


应该是D,


can potentially àredundant


potential for 是惯用语


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-3-7 22:20:20编辑过]

作者: xinfaxian    时间: 2005-7-6 11:29

考虑到can 和potentially的重复性,此题偶也选了D.大家说说看,到底是d 还是e啊?请继续讨论。


作者: xinfaxian    时间: 2005-7-7 09:58
顶一下。i still think it should be d
作者: Avantasia    时间: 2005-7-7 10:29

我认为是E,


has the potential for causing看起多罗嗦, 没有can, potentially, cause来的简介和明确, 答案是比较出来的, 我觉得这里potentially的重复相对来讲是次要矛盾了.


作者: llrllrllr    时间: 2005-8-8 16:52
up,根据OG的解释can potentially is redundant ,为什么还选E,D为何不对,是potential的用法错了吗?
作者: zuckzhc    时间: 2005-8-18 14:56
up. I don't understand the usage of "can, potentially, cause..."


作者: z520m    时间: 2005-9-11 22:23
根据longman: potential for :The company certainly has the potential for growth.可见potential for是常用的,并且can potential应该是不正确的,can本身是有可能的意思!大家有没有在什么阅读中看到过can potential的用法?我没看到过。请nn指导!
作者: howardwang    时间: 2005-9-12 12:20

根据longman对potential for的解释:


the possibility that something will develop in a particular way, or have a particular effect
potential for
The company certainly has the potential for growth.


我们可以看出,potential for后面应该是可能发生的事情,而本题中causing errors in judgment是已经发生的事情;


而且,for后面跟的应该是potential目的,而不是结果。所以,你可以说potential for growth,而不可说,potential for causing errors in judgment。


所以,还是E更好。(potentially有无逗号,还是有点差别的。)


作者: z520m    时间: 2005-9-17 21:49

题目就是表达一种will的可能性,请问楼上的从哪里看出来已经发生了?楼上自己的假设?


作者: endless_tao    时间: 2005-12-18 05:17
以下是引用howardwang在2005-9-12 12:20:00的发言:

根据longman对potential for的解释:


the possibility that something will develop in a particular way, or have a particular effect
potential for
The company certainly has the potential for growth.


我们可以看出,potential for后面应该是可能发生的事情,而本题中causing errors in judgment是已经发生的事情;


而且,for后面跟的应该是potential目的,而不是结果。所以,你可以说potential for growth,而不可说,potential for causing errors in judgment。


所以,还是E更好。(potentially有无逗号,还是有点差别的。)


支持一下!


作者: 麦麦麦    时间: 2006-2-7 12:51

为什么不能选B呢, D,E的a practice是否显的多余呢? 而且也避免了用potentially,


OG中:For members of the seventeenth-century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment, a method to protect warriors against enemy arrows and spears.


(A) a method to protect


(B) as a method protecting


(C) protecting


(D) as a protection ofC


(E) to protect


Choice C is best because the participle protecting begins a phrase that explains what the shields did. Choices A and B awkwardly use the singular word method to refer to items of military equipment rather than to the use of such items. Also, a method of protecting would be more idiomatic than a method to protect in A or a method protecting in B. In B and D, as is incorrect; also, a protection in D has no noun for which it can logically substitute. Choice E is incomplete; used to protect would have been acceptable.



作者: tonyyuan    时间: 2007-2-14 20:47
以下是引用howardwang在2005-9-12 12:20:00的发言:

根据longman对potential for的解释:

the possibility that something will develop in a particular way, or have a particular effect
potential for
The company certainly has the potential for growth.

我们可以看出,potential for后面应该是可能发生的事情,而本题中causing errors in judgment是已经发生的事情;

而且,for后面跟的应该是potential目的,而不是结果。所以,你可以说potential for growth,而不可说,potential for causing errors in judgment。

所以,还是E更好。(potentially有无逗号,还是有点差别的。)

我就想问这个问题,为什么can和potentially后面加逗号?不加行不行,我就是因为有逗号而没有选E!


作者: aegean040    时间: 2008-6-11 22:20

支持D,

根据LONGMAN的解释,potential for sth 但是没有例句说明可以接doing结构,

但是又查了牛津7th高级字典,很清楚的说明当potential做名词时,有potential for/ for doing sth的用法。

EG:the potential for change.

The European marketplace offers excellent potential for increasing sales.

再者,大全中有一道题也是用的potential for doing结构:补充250-106

106.    In large doses, analgesics that work in the brain as antagonists to certain chemicals have caused psychological disturbances in patients, which may limit their potential to relieve severe pain.

(A) which may limit their potential to relieve

(B) which may limit their potential for relieving

(C) which may limit such analgesics’ potential to relieve

(D) an effect that may limit their potential to relieveE

(E) an effect that may limit the potential of such analgesics for relieving


作者: minivicki    时间: 2008-6-15 15:28
以下是引用aegean040在2008-6-11 22:20:00的发言:

再者,大全中有一道题也是用的potential for doing结构:补充250-106

106.    In large doses, analgesics that work in the brain as antagonists to certain chemicals have caused psychological disturbances in patients, which may limit their potential to relieve severe pain.

(A) which may limit their potential to relieve

(B) which may limit their potential for relieving

(C) which may limit such analgesics’ potential to relieve

(D) an effect that may limit their potential to relieveE

(E) an effect that may limit the potential of such analgesics for relieving

从楼上的例子,突然给了我一个启发,应该选择E。 以下是我对D不正确的思路,欢迎大家讨论指正:

这道题目的D: overtime, a practice that has the potential for causing 是不对的,因为它没有表达出是谁has the potential 来cause error. 根据句子的意思,应该是key people 来 cause error 的。那么如果D要正确的话,必须像楼上给的例子的正确答案 E. an effect that may limit the potential of such analgesics for relieving 那样,把key people 补出来罗。即:把D改成: overtime, a practice that has the potential of key people for causing 才对。


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-6-15 15:30:06编辑过]

作者: coney8813    时间: 2008-10-22 17:05

根据楼上的说法,potential的用法是不是规定为the potential of sb. for doing sth?只有这一种用法吗


作者: 丫丫兔    时间: 2009-2-10 23:36
以下是引用minivicki在2008-6-15 15:28:00的发言:

从楼上的例子,突然给了我一个启发,应该选择E。 以下是我对D不正确的思路,欢迎大家讨论指正:

这道题目的D: overtime, a practice that has the potential for causing 是不对的,因为它没有表达出是谁has the potential 来cause error. 根据句子的意思,应该是key people 来 cause error 的。那么如果D要正确的话,必须像楼上给的例子的正确答案 E. an effect that may limit the potential of such analgesics for relieving 那样,把key people 补出来罗。即:把D改成: overtime, a practice that has the potential of key people for causing 才对。


有道理,好细心!!




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3