123. The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a River City newspaper.
“The Clio Development Group’s plan for a multilevel parking garage on Dock Street should be approved in order to strengthen the economy of the surrounding area. Although most of the buildings on the block would have to be demolished, they are among the oldest in the city and thus of little current economic value. Those who oppose the project should realize that historic preservation cannot be the only consideration: even Athens or Jerusalem will knock down old buildings to put up new ones that improve the local economy.”
给River城的报纸编辑的一封信：
Clio发展商在Dock街修建多层停车场的计划应该被批准以便加强附近地区的经济。虽然这个街区的大多数建筑将被摧毁，但他们是这个城市最老的建筑因此现在没有多少经济价值了。那些反对这个项目的人应该认识到保护历史不能是唯一的考虑，甚至雅典和耶路撒冷也会拆除旧建筑来盖新建筑以促进本地经济。
求此题攻击思路？
错误类比，雅典古建筑那么多，拆几个也没事，而且那些地方发展经济的重要性大于古建筑的保存
谢了，斑竹！
1、建筑多层的停车厂未必会增强周围的经济实力。如果DOCK STREET在高速公路旁边，人烟稀少，谁会去那停车
2、拆除老的建筑发展以发展当地的经济显然是荒谬的。有很多国家，例如意大利的比撒斜塔，考这些古老的建筑去发展旅游事业从而发展当地的经济
3、就算是建筑多层停车厂，拆除老建筑物能发展当地的经济，作者也没有提供相关的证据去证明发展本地经济
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |