ChaseDream

标题: prep 1-134 希望牛人在线讨论 [打印本页]

作者: soniashi 时间: 2007-7-4 09:39
标题: prep 1-134 希望牛人在线讨论

134.
(31696-!-item-!-188;#058&004702)

Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than nonunion members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend less time with each.

(A) imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend

(B) imposing stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients, and spending

(D) that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spending

(E) that impose stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients and spending

非常不明白这道题，看过前人的讨论，依然觉得不能说服我。

有非常明白本题的NN在吗？

诚恳请教在线讨论

或者我打电话过去也可以

谢谢

作者: addy 时间: 2007-7-4 10:10

答案是D?

impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients补充说明lower-end insurance plans的用处和特点,spending less time with each是表明doctors怎么去see more patients

作者: soniashi 时间: 2007-7-4 10:16

See 和 spend 不是并列的吗？

我觉得这个逻辑很奇怪呢

而且这里的spending可以修饰doctor?好像感觉怪怪的，是不是有歧义可以修饰的是plan?

谢谢指教

作者: addy 时间: 2007-7-4 10:18

see和spending不并列,spending也不是修饰doctor,spending less time with each是分词句表方法或结果,相当于说how the doctors to see more patients==>by spending less time with each

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-7-4 10:20:34编辑过]

作者: soniashi 时间: 2007-7-4 10:42

我看到的句子里面关于v.ing表示结果，方法，都是针对句子的主语的。

不过你这个解释也是最好的了。。。

谢谢

作者: smartsky11 时间: 2009-3-29 23:15
12

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)