TTGWD2-Q3
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were not to be concluded.
A. is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were
B. is expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal was
C. is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement be signed by them with a provision for penalties if the deal were
D. are expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until it signs a merger agreement with a provision for penalties included if the deal was
E. are expected to be making an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal were
答案給C 我選B
我想問的是
(1).如果選C, 好像變成有兩個從屬子句連用1.until...penalties 2.if the deal were... not to be concluded 這樣不太合理吧
(2)若要用if the deal were...假設法,但是主要子句並沒有用would/could/should/might這樣是不是表應該用was(直說法ㄋ)
(3)答案c改用被動,看起來就是一個怪,
國外的網站大家討論是a不知道大家覺得如何
我選b後來才發現make an offer for好像應該改用to 不過基於直說法的裡由 我一開始就刪掉a了,畢竟時態跟慣用語比起來是比較容易判斷的錯誤
不是牛牛
不过一直觉得表目的的话to do比for doing更好,所以一上来就把B排除了
至于A项,我觉得是a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties,that修饰agreement的话,应该挨着agreement,这样原文感觉离得远了点吧,所以A也排除了
关于你的问题:
(1)我觉得不是从句连用,结构应该是until (a merger agreement be signed by them with a provision for penalties (if the deal were not to be concluded)),是个从句套从句
(2)C项有用虚拟啊a merger agreement (should) be signed,不是省略了should吗?
(3)虽然说主动优于被动,但是从各个别的方面看C都要更好一些吧
上面是我的理解,仅供楼主参考
TO bluebabka:
謝謝你的回覆,很清楚明白,對我來說很牛啦...
不過我有一點不明白的是,為什麼should可以省略,我翻了翻文法書,也去網路上找過,
只發現if的省略(should當萬一...),不知道大大從那邊得看到的,可否告訴小弟
我頂!!
有人可以解答嗎 感激不盡
这题,好绕啊。
is expected to 应该是对的。to make an offer to buy 比doing好,这么一排,就剩A和C两个答案了。
先看A。is expected 和is signed 这两个动作是不是都发生了?如果发生了,那个在前,哪个在后?两个都用现在进行时合适么?如果两个动作都发生过,不是虚拟的话,这个句子我会写作 ....had been expected ......was signed.用现在时似乎没法讲清楚两个动作的关系。
看C。其实C只是假设了一种情形,sign这个动作还没发生。C是通的,省略了should。
结论,选C
不知道讲的清不清楚。总之,A的时态有问题。
謝謝兩位的解答
我也接受(c)是假設法的解釋,因為這樣(c)就能完全說的通
不過還是希望有人能說說,should的省略哪邊可以查到相關文法,因為我只查到if可以省
真沒有 那就硬背下來啦!!
我还有问题呢!
为什么the deal要用were,不用was?还是不明白呢!
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |