ChaseDream

标题: OG 194 [打印本页]

作者: leehom    时间: 2003-11-21 19:04
标题: OG 194
Presenters at the seminar, one who is blind, will demonstrate adaptive equipment that allows visually impaired people to use computers.
D. one of whom
我对答案D没有意见。但我想起以前的一句话好像是apples, one of which..., ETS认为是 Awkward,请问sth, one of which/whom这样的句型有吗?
另外,如果句子是..at the seminar, many of them blind,...,many of them blind可以算是同位语吗?
作者: lixiaoyang    时间: 2003-11-21 19:35
one of whom不是一个固定句型,而是修饰presenters.
不是同位语
作者: leehom    时间: 2003-11-21 23:03
那我想问many of them是同位语吗?
作者: lixiaoyang    时间: 2003-11-22 20:15
no
作者: iinobscurity    时间: 2003-11-23 00:03
I think you are a little confused with apposition and relative clause.
In this sentence, even you replace one of whom is blind with ALL OF WHOM ARE BLIND,
It still is a relative clause to modify "Presenters at the seminar"
And Which/ whom are called relative pronouns



作者: smartj    时间: 2003-11-23 00:48
什么是“同位语”?E文怎么说?same position word?
作者: 心晴    时间: 2004-6-11 08:02
以下是引用smartj在2003-11-23 0:48:00的发言:
什么是“同位语”?E文怎么说?same position word?


appositive:n.同位语,adj.同位格的。


我想知道的是,这个题是不是换成one of them也可以?


作者: tianwan    时间: 2004-6-11 08:42

As a matter of fact, I personally feel that ETS does not care about the term he uses. The "one of whom"is obviously accuming the task of a subject in a relative clause. The most conspicuous difference between a relative clause and a appositive clause is that the relative pronoun plays no role in the subclause in the appositive clause whiel the relative pronoun is the subject or object etc. in the relative clause.


I deem the reason ETS call the clause beginning "one of whom" is that the role of the clause played by a nonrestricve clause is the same as that of the clause played by a appositive clause, that is, discribing or expaining the meaning of the antecedent.


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-11 8:59:24编辑过]

作者: winnie    时间: 2005-1-19 13:12

og 194.解释:the subject, presenters, must be followed by a limiting appositive such as one of whom, that identifies an individual from among a larger group.

what is “ limiting appositive ”?


作者: cicilla    时间: 2005-1-19 15:51

哈哈,刚好看到有人解释同位语啦,他说得很清楚,给你看看:

同谓语和定语从句的区别:Adult survivors of child abuse traditionally have had little or no chance that they could get their symptoms recognized and treated.
(A) that they could get their symptoms recognized and treated
(B) to recognize and treat their symptoms
(C) of getting their symptoms recognized and treated
(D) of recognizing and treating symptoms(C)
(E) of getting his or her symptoms recognized and treated
A.that在这里起到同位语修饰的作用,但是chance,opportunity,way一般是不可以带that同位语修饰的。
1.同位语定语从句的区别是同位语的that只是连接词,在从句中部当任何成分。所以A的that从句是同位语。
2.同位语对同位语修饰的名词,就语义关系来说,相当于主语补语(或表语)或宾语所起的作用。常以that分句做同位语的名词有fact,risk,wish,announcement,realization,answer,belief,conclusion,decision,discovery,doubt,evidence,explanation,hope,idea, information,knowledge,law,news,opinion,possibility,probability,problem,principle,promise,report,rumour,statement,thought,understanding,truth等等。
如:做主语补语:The had to face the fact that the nearest filling station is thirty kilometers away.我们可以说 The fact is that the nearest filling station is thirty kilometers away.
再如:做宾语:There was a recommendation that she be promoted.我们可以说 They recommended that sh be promoted.
而这一题A中,我们不能说The chance is that they could get their symptoms recognized and treated.


作者: winnie    时间: 2005-1-20 10:27

谢谢!但是我想知道的是what is “ limiting appositive ”,或者limiting appositive与appositive有什么区别?

另外,og 194. Presenters at the seminar, one of whom is blind, will demonstrate adaptive equipment.

og解释: one of whom best serves an appositive to the subject, presenters, because the phrase means “one from among several or many.”

one of whom is blind作为presenters的appositive,whom算什么?

应该不是relative pronoun,不是疑问代词。仅行使普通代词的功能?

欢迎讨论!


作者: Chamao    时间: 2005-1-20 11:04

APPOSITIVES

A word, phrase or clause that means the same thing as (i.e., synonym) or further explains another noun (pronoun).

Non-restrictive appositives are not essential to the meaning of the sentence.

Restrictive appositives are essential to the meaning of the sentence.

1. NON-RESTRICTIVE:


2. RESTRICTIVE:


作者: tdyg    时间: 2006-1-25 07:32
猫猫mm做了一个总结性发言。pretty good!
作者: titatita    时间: 2006-2-8 21:43
以下是引用winnie在2005-1-20 10:27:00的发言:

谢谢!但是我想知道的是what is “ limiting appositive ”,或者limiting appositive与appositive有什么区别?


另外,og 194. Presenters at the seminar, one of whom is blind, will demonstrate adaptive equipment.


og解释: one of whom best serves an appositive to the subject, presenters, because the phrase means “one from among several or many.”


one of whom is blind作为presenters的appositive,whom算什么?


应该不是relative pronoun,不是疑问代词。仅行使普通代词的功能?


欢迎讨论!



one of whom is blind作为presentersappositivewhom算什么?


Whom指代主语presenters,这里用宾格是因为做介词of的宾语,所以用宾格,ets的意思是,这里需要一个限定性同位语来定义presenters中的一个.


作者: crystal2003    时间: 2006-2-9 01:58
Thank you!
作者: jandjshi    时间: 2006-2-9 04:03

这里哪个是主语?One还是Presenters? 这里用了will看不出来,如果用进行时,那谓语应是is demo'ing 还是 are demo'ing.


作者: jandjshi    时间: 2006-2-9 05:58

哦,看明白了,Presenters是主语,are demo'ing...



作者: tiandaochouqin    时间: 2006-7-14 08:47
以下是引用titatita在2006-2-8 21:43:00的发言:

one of whom is blind作为presentersappositivewhom算什么?

同问啊!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Whom指代主语presenters,这里用宾格是因为做介词of的宾语,所以用宾格,ets的意思是,这里需要一个限定性同位语来定义presenters中的一个.


作者: haijung    时间: 2007-3-21 10:40

我的问题和楼主一样,不过看了讨论觉得还是没有清楚的定论,想请教NN,为什么这边
            
one of whom is blind
动词是用
            
is,
而不是
            
N1 of N2 that/which V2 (
动词跟N2的单多数决定)这个规则,烦请NN可以说清楚一些吗? 感激~~


作者: shuishui_xp    时间: 2008-7-31 10:31

 one of them is blind已经是个语法结构完整的句子了,当然不可以了。

除非换成 one of them blind,还可以做独立主格。


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-7-31 10:34:00编辑过]





欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3