Brochure: Help conserve our city’s water supply. By converting the landscaping in your yard to a water-conserving landscape, you can greatly reduce your outdoor water use. A water-conserving landscape is natural and attractive, and it also saves you money.
Criticism: For most people with yards, the savings from converting to a water-conserving landscape cannot justify the expense of new landscaping, since typically the conversion would save less than twenty dollars on a homeowner’s yearly water bills.
Which of the following, if true, provides the best basis for a rebuttal of the criticism?
看了答案选b,这道题难道是问哪一个能反驳Criticism的观点吗?provides the best basis for a rebuttal of the criticism到底怎么理解,我做题是理解的是哪一个支持criticism对Brochure的反驳
I think 这道题是问哪一个能反驳Criticism的观点.
Criticism claims that savings cannot justify expenses.
So, the rebuttal of the criticism is: the savings outweight the expenditures. A conventional requires much more expenses.
So, it is B.
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |