ChaseDream
标题: GWD-23-Q38 -- NN plz help [打印本页]
作者: chamcham 时间: 2007-6-18 16:20
标题: GWD-23-Q38 -- NN plz help
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Drawing on her roots in a society that has a strong tradition of story-telling and oral renditions of the past, Indian writer Suniti Namjoshi incorporates many types of literature into her writing: including historical texts, legends, and even nursery rhymes from both Indian as well as European sources.
- writing: including historical texts, legends, and even nursery rhymes from both Indian as well as
- writing: historical texts, legends, and even nursery rhymes from both Indian and
- writing: these include historical texts, legends, and even nursery rhymes from both Indian and
- writing, which includes historical texts, legends, and even nursery rhymes both from Indian as well as
- writing that includes historical texts, legends, and even nursery rhymes both from Indian and
Not sure about BCE, answer is B or C.
Please help,
[此贴子已经被作者于2007-6-21 14:18:09编辑过]
作者: chamcham 时间: 2007-6-19 17:26
any help? plz
作者: chamcham 时间: 2007-6-21 14:17
up
作者: lovebook0824 时间: 2009-5-17 05:05
现在的答案是B，可是B中不会有歧义吗？感觉C更好，these指代many types of literature.麻烦NN解释~~~
作者: cheergo 时间: 2009-5-17 08:50
不是NN，个人觉得冒号本身就包含了Include的意思，B是最简洁的答案。
作者: lucycheng 时间: 2009-6-10 15:37
..........我想请问一下冒号后可以不跟句子？我有点跟封号搞起来了
作者: AlienX 时间: 2009-6-10 16:01
yup
OG10#169: Seismologists studying the earthquake that struck northern California in October 1989 are still investigating some of its mysteries: the unexpected power of the seismic waves, the upward thrust that threw one man straight into the air, and the strange electromagnetic signals detected hours before the temblor.
作者: whismanc 时间: 2009-7-28 10:55
thx
作者: skigorush 时间: 2009-7-28 17:04
作者: rucky521 时间: 2009-7-28 18:23
up
作者: leonlay 时间: 2009-7-31 02:39
ding
作者: pwss 时间: 2009-7-31 20:40
up
作者: wangchen0355 时间: 2009-8-3 10:45
1
作者: yinan 时间: 2009-10-3 22:16
顶，是否可以理解成：冒号表示列举时后面跟列举的例子；当冒号表示解释时后面跟句子
作者: shapooya 时间: 2012-2-23 05:15
顶，是否可以理解成：冒号表示列举时后面跟列举的例子；当冒号表示解释时后面跟句子
-- by 会员 yinan (2009/10/3 22:16:00)
说得好！
作者: 我不爱养宠物 时间: 2014-11-6 16:16
考点：
固定搭配。Both…and
A.冒号已经有解释说明的意思，including是否重复了。Both搭配错误。
B.Correct
C.These错误，these只能是these+N的用法，此处these冗余
D.Which与literature相隔太远，有修饰歧义即便可以，includes错误，应该是include，both不平行
E.限定性定语从句用法错误，that无法修饰到literature，both后面不平行。
作者: neomy 时间: 2014-12-3 23:46
these 可以指最近的复数，好像哪里说的，这不是绝对性错误；但是冒号后面感觉解释her writing的类型感觉也说得通，感觉有歧义，支持C
作者: demiding 时间: 2017-1-7 10:26
冒号本身就有解释说明的意思。直接选b
作者: 5Day 时间: 2017-1-8 12:43
突然问起，我感觉冒号是不能跟句子的，多用于列举。但是也不敢把话说绝对。
作者: 5Day 时间: 2017-1-8 12:47
作者: emmahiggins09 时间: 2017-1-10 17:43
这里涉及到英语中的一种用法，当冒号用于来introduce a list 的时候，这个list 肯定是一个完整的(complete) list, 而including 是不能用于完整的list 的举例的。
其次冒号后面是可以跟句子的，曼哈顿语法中有这么一句话：
you can put a main clause after a colon as well.
所以冒号的用法是，冒号之前必须是完整的句子，冒号之后可以是完整的句子也可以不是
作者: 5Day 时间: 2017-1-12 23:35
哦哦酱紫！谢谢指正！
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |