57. Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that if they did not hold it,
their grip on Algeria was always insecure.
(A) if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure
(B) without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure
(C) their grip on Algeria was not ever secure if they did not hold it
(D) without that, they could never be secure about their grip on Algeria
(E) never would their grip on Algeria be secure if they did not hold it
Grammatical construction + Verb form
ifx happened, then y would happen.
A The verb was should be the conditional would be; wordy and imprecise
B Correct. This clear, concise sentence
correctly uses the conditional would never be.
C The verb was should be the conditional
would be; pronoun it is ambiguous and could
refer to either Morocco or Algeria
D It, not that, should be used to refer back to Morocco;
could never be secure about their grip is awkward
E Inverted word order is awkward and confusing;
it could refer to either
Morocco or
Algeria
The correct answer is B.
绿色部分不明白,it不是泛指主谓宾么,为什么可以指代Algeria?
their grip on Algeria was not ever secure if they did not hold it 这句连下来就很容易联想到Algeria了啊
但是it不是泛指主谓宾么?
Algeria
只是做定语啊?
请指正
有这个说法么?如果有,还望LZ请给出确切的出处
字典上说的应该是:it指代前面出现过的名词
新东方笔记写的是:it为特指词,指某个特定词及其全部的定语修饰
如果这样的话,那C里的it应该指代their grip on Algeria 不是么?
还是我哪里理解错了?
谢谢指正
it或they在主句中只指代【主句】中其前面出现的名词
it或they在从句中可指代【主句】或【从句】中其前面出现的名词
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |