Q28(问问问):
Editorial in Krenlandian Newspaper:
Krenland’s steelmakers are losing domestic sales because of lower-priced imports, in many cases because foreign governments subsidize their steel industries in ways that are banned by international treaties. But whatever the cause, the cost is ultimately going to be jobs in Krenland’s steel industry. Therefore, it would protect not only steel companies but also industrial employment in Krenland if our government took measures to reduce cheap steel imports.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the editorial’s argument?
c选项竟然是正确答案。。。请各位帮忙解释一下毫不?
fact: lower-priced steel import=>the cost is the jobs of Krenland's steel industry
conclusion: reduce cheap steel imports will benefit the companies and industry employment
因果关系存在,要削弱,则因(为事实) +否果,因推不出否果,则他因存在;
A. 无关选项(侧面加强事实)
B. 无关选项(侧面加强事实)
C. 减少低价钢铁进口会影响manufacturer的竞争力=〉造成失业
D. 弱support
E. 小无关,纠缠果之因素二
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |