ChaseDream

标题: GWD4-Q39. [打印本页]

作者: cjyc1 时间: 2007-6-3 13:56
标题: GWD4-Q39.

Unearthed in China, fossils of feathered dinosaurs offer the most dramatic evidence yet discovered of the close evolutionary relationship between dinosaurs and birds.

offer the most dramatic evidence yet discovered of the close evolutionary relationship between dinosaurs and birds
offer evidence more dramatic than what has yet been discovered of the close evolutionary relationship between dinosaurs and birds
offer more dramatic evidence of the close evolutionary relationship than any yet discovered between dinosaurs and birds
have offered the most dramatic evidence of the close evolutionary relationship between dinosaurs and birds that have yet been discovered
have offered more dramatic evidence than any that has yet been discovered of the close evolutionary relationship between dinosaurs and birds

答案是A，我的答案是E

作者: Gudjohnson 时间: 2007-6-3 22:52
原文的最高级形式最好不要改变

作者: gg137 时间: 2008-9-25 00:27

D为什么不对啊？

A offer the most dramatic evidence yet discovered of 没有that又啰嗦

作者: deadpig1987 时间: 2008-12-30 09:44

以下是引用gg137在2008-9-25 0:27:00的发言：

D为什么不对啊？

A offer the most dramatic evidence yet discovered of 没有that又啰嗦

ed分词可以直接修饰名词不用加that

原文中用yet discovered修饰evidence 是强调已发现的证据当中最dramatic的，不是罗嗦， D选项直接把定语删掉，影响了逻辑意思，表达就没有那么精准了～

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-12-30 9:46:37编辑过]

作者: 中国故乡的云 时间: 2009-4-15 11:49

D,E 用现在完成时，意思就是：从过去开始一直到现在，这些化石都提供了最有力的证据，逻辑含义错误。化石在过去还没被发现的时候，是不能提供最有力的证据的，只有被发现以后，才能提供。

直接排除D，E。

B，C 用了than what has yet been discovered ，than any ，相当于比较的时候把自己都放在一起比了，错误。应该是 any other fossils 才行。

B. offer evidence more dramatic than what has yet been discovered of the close evolutionary relationship between dinosaurs and birds

C. offer more dramatic evidence of the close evolutionary relationship than any yet discovered between dinosaurs and birds

作者: emyzhong2009 时间: 2009-9-26 13:20
完成时态没有根据，排除D E，且D中的that从句修饰对象错误，应该修饰evidence而不是dinosaurs and birds；
A 正确，用最高级简洁，意思明确，且(yet)
discovered…过去完成时直接修饰evidence简洁。

作者: love+1 时间: 2009-9-26 13:32
楼上MM的回帖很疯狂

作者: sires_0 时间: 2009-10-11 16:41

总觉得A会产生歧义，discovered 和of the close evolutionary relationship 都是修饰evidence的吗?可以不会产生歧义，认为of the close evolutionary relationship是修饰discovered的吗？或者说分词和介词短语可以这张同时修饰同一名词吗

作者: anniezhang12 时间: 2009-10-26 16:09

以下是引用sires_0在2009/10/11 16:41:00的发言：

回楼上，yet discovered 作定语修饰evidence, 没有discovered of sth这种搭配，但是evidence of sth 是对的~~所以不存在你说的那种情况吧

作者: andy2086 时间: 2013-12-4 17:12
我觉得还是从逻辑语义来理解。
B选项offer evidence more dramatic than 比较的不是证据，而是dramatic 的程度，不符合。
C选项修饰语对象不对，than any yet discovered between dinosaurs and birds ，改变句意。不对。
D选项省略掉修饰语yet discovered 的内容，不好。
E选项than any that has yet been discovered 罗嗦。排除

我选择的时候也错选成B。没有把yet discovered 当作定语来理解。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)