ChaseDream

标题: GWD8-3搜不到。。。 [打印本页]
作者: joejo9    时间: 2007-5-25 00:23
标题: GWD8-3搜不到。。。

In the late 1980’s, the population of sea otters in the North Pacific Ocean began to decline. Of the two plausible explanations for the decline—increased predation by killer whales or disease—disease is the more likely. After all, a concurrent sharp decline in the populations of seals and sea lions was almost certainly caused by a pollution-related disease, which could have spread to sea otters, whereas the population of killer whales did not change noticeably.

 

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the reasoning?

 

  1. Killer whales in the North Pacific usually prey on seals and sea lions but will, when this food source is scarce, seek out other prey.

  2. There is no indication that substantial numbers of sea otters migrated to other locations from the North Pacific in the 1980’s.

  3. Along the Pacific coast of North America in the 1980’s, sea otters were absent from many locations where they had been relatively common in former times.

  4. Following the decline in the population of the sea otters, there was an increase in the population of sea urchins, which are sea otters’ main food source.

  5. The North Pacific populations of seals and sea lions cover a wider geographic area than does the population of sea otters.

作者: will_kk    时间: 2007-5-25 00:54

题目是：结论：otter两个数量下降原因：disease和incresed predation,disease更可能

条件：1，decline in the populations of seals and sea lions 由disease引起，这种病友可能传给sea otter

           2, killer whale数量没有上升（这里暗含假设是，whale捕食量上升）

A,提出weaken了其中暗含的假设，提出了另外一种解释   decline in the populations of seals and sea lions导致了killer whale食物少了，所以更多的吃otter咯

作者: 坨坨元    时间: 2011-9-3 22:36
题目是：结论：otter两个数量下降原因：disease和incresed predation,disease更可能
条件：1，decline in the populations of seals and sea lions 由disease引起，这种病友可能传给sea otter
          2, killer whale数量没有上升（这里暗含假设是，whale捕食量上升）
A,提出weaken了其中暗含的假设，提出了另外一种解释   decline in the populations of seals and sea lions导致了killer whale食物少了，所以更多的吃otter咯
-- by 会员 will_kk (2007/5/25 0:54:00)


LZ不觉得A选项是对条件2 （kiler whale 数量没有上升 暗含的whale捕食量上升的假设）的具体的解释吗？
正式因为whale去吃otter去了，所以数量没有下降啊。这不就是对reasoning的具体解释吗？并没有起到削弱作用啊？
如果要说此题有削弱作用 应该是对disease这种可能性的否定。。
我认为该题的削弱性不是很强啊~~
不过利用排除法也只有A还稍稍削弱了一点。。
有没有更好的解释啊！！！很困惑！！



欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3