ChaseDream

标题: prep2-28 [打印本页]

作者: kitebird    时间: 2007-5-24 00:12
标题: prep2-28

Hutonian Government Official:  Federal law requires truck drivers to take a long break after driving for ten hours, but truck drivers frequently do not comply.  Since the public rest areas along our highways cannot accommodate all the drivers needing a break, we plan to build more rest areas to increase the rate of compliance.

 

Hutonian Business Representative:  But if the parking lots around our businesses are considered, there are more than enough parking places.

 

Which of the following, if true about Hutonia, would provide a reason for persisting with the government official's plan despite the objection?

 

(A) Public parking areas are evenly distributed along the highways.

(B) Truck drivers are most likely not to comply with the federal law if the total time required for a trip exceeds ten hours by less than an hour.

(C) In comparison to public rest areas, private parking lots near highways tend to be time-consuming for drivers to reach.

(D) Even when rest areas are available, some truck drivers park in places, such as highway access ramps, where their trucks are likely to cause accidents.

(E) Some public parking areas, particularly those on heavily traveled roads, are substantially larger than others.

答案是C,不理解。做题的时候一个都选不出来


作者: gonghao    时间: 2007-5-24 09:56

支持offical的说法,必须提供更加多的停车厂

C支持,因为C在说现在的停车场要走好长的时间才能到,司机要花很长时间到那里去休息


作者: kitebird    时间: 2007-5-25 00:34

难道the parking lots around our businesses 就是指private parking吗?

这样的话就说的通了。

否则突然出现一个比较,并不能说明问题


作者: 东西方隐    时间: 2008-1-2 04:25

同问.

还是没有看出来为什么 the parking lots around our business = private parking?

我觉得ETS还是有defect的...


作者: nipaan    时间: 2009-6-1 13:42

我的神啊!


作者: ruirui_hsu    时间: 2009-8-2 18:19
我觉得C项是削弱政府的计划
作者: yase880211    时间: 2009-9-14 20:38
up~~~~




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3