ChaseDream

标题: 请教gwd6-28 [打印本页]

作者: joejo9 时间: 2007-5-22 13:00
标题: 请教gwd6-28

GWD6-Q28:

不知道是不是题目号有问题搜出来的帖子居然是语法的真是orz

Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?

According to promotional material published by the city of Springfield, more tourists stay in hotels in Springfield than stay in the neighboring city of Harristown. A brochure from the largest hotel in Harristown claims that more tourists stay in that hotel than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel in Springfield. If both of these sources are accurate, however, the county’s “Report on Tourism” must be in error in indicating that _______.

more tourists stay in hotel accommodations in Harristown than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel
the Royal Arms Hotel is the only hotel in Springfield
there are several hotels in Harristown that are larger than the Royal Arms Hotel
some of the tourists who have stayed in hotels in Harristown have also stayed in the Royal Arms Hotel
some hotels in Harristown have fewer tourist guests each year than the Royal Arms Hotel has

作者: joejo9 时间: 2007-5-22 13:01
请问这个 report on tourism 究竟指的是什么？

作者: gonghao 时间: 2007-5-22 14:55

S比H人多

H里最大的酒店说，他这里的游客比S里的R酒店的人要多

如果R是S里唯一的酒店的话，那么结果就是H比S的人多。则和文章的另外一个情况S比H人多。所以这是必错的。

作者: sweetjenny 时间: 2007-6-9 15:47

这个题目的内容来源就是“Report on Tourism”, 或者说题目讨论的内容是这个report的观点。思路如下：

题中条件（1）住在Spirng酒店的人数>住在Harris酒店人数

（2）住Harris最大酒店人数>住Sping RAH酒店人数

这两个条件同时正确看似矛盾，其实是报告没说清楚，认为Spring RAH概念等同于Spring酒店这个概念，即Spring只有 1家酒店RAH

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)