ChaseDream

标题: 问几道机经题 [打印本页]

作者: vivifly 时间: 2007-5-20 09:36
标题: 问几道机经题
问一下大家几个机经中的问题。这两天的机经中，哪位知道这两个题是GWD的哪两道原题啊？
多谢了，我这是帮老婆总结机经呢，不太熟悉GMAT的题，多谢了

RC. １８００－１８９０　美国女性婚后的物质权利．　描述了洲的权利法的改变，　从女性没有property rights 到有些洲开始

pass woman's marriage property act.

这个是gwd的阅读吧，但是找不到了，有谁知道是哪篇不？？？急…… 谢谢咯！！！

SC.只记得一个了鱼的眼睛那题，跟manmal的眼睛不同，答案是from a mamal’s

CR. 考了著名的sulfur从外面大气层进入内部大气层的题

多谢了！

作者: Damei 时间: 2007-5-20 09:42

CR是31套里的29套-28，也是22套里18套的41题

rc正是我要问的……

作者: xiaoyue00302 时间: 2007-5-20 19:07

（1） GWD-17-Q17

Because fish look through water, their eyes are very different from a mammal.

from a mammal
from a mammal’s
from that of a mammal
than that of a mammal
than is a mammal’s

B the best

C中的that单数不能指代eyes。

1. GWD-29-Q28

Astronomer: Observations of the Shoemaker-Levi comet on its collision course with Jupiter showed that the comet broke into fragments before entering Jupiter’s atmosphere in 1994, but they did not show how big those fragments were. Nevertheless, some indication of their size can be inferred from spectrographic analyses of Jupiter’s outer atmosphere. After the fragments’ entry, these analyses revealed unprecedented traces of sulfur. The fragments themselves almost certainly contained no sulfur, but astronomers believe that the cloud layer below Jupiter’s outer atmosphere does contain sulfur. Since sulfur would have seeped into the outer atmosphere if comet fragments had penetrated this cloud layer, it is likely that some of the fragments were at least large enough to have passed through Jupiter’s outer atmosphere without being burned up.

In the astronomer’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

The first is a claim that the astronomer seeks to show is true; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the truth of that claim.
The first is a claim that the astronomer seeks to show is true; the second provides evidence in support of the truth of that claim.
The first and the second are each considerations advanced in support of the conclusion of the argument.
The first provides evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.
The first is a circumstance for which the astronomer seeks to provide an explanation; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the explanation provided by the astronomer.

阅读不是老题。

你还真是不简单，有这么牛的老婆

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-5-20 19:09:57编辑过]

作者: Sacramento_CA 时间: 2007-5-20 20:36
BF做PREP的时候第一题就是了，内容是一样的，但是黑体的部分不一样。不知道怎么贴出来啊，请知道的同学指点一下。我发出来大家分享一下

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)