ChaseDream

标题: 最后两个 27－1－22 27－2－16 [打印本页]

作者: 番茄炒蛋 时间: 2003-11-16 20:40
标题: 最后两个 27－1－22 27－2－16
22. It is absurd idea that whatever artistic endeavor the government refuses to support it does not allow, as one can see by rephrasing the statement to read: No one is allowed to create art without a government subsidy.

The pattern of reasoning in which one of the following is most similar to that in the argument above?

(A) The claim that any driver who is not arrested does not break the law is absurd, as one can see by rewording it: Every driver who breaks the law gets arrested.

(B) The claim that any driver who is not arrested does mot break the law is absurd, as one can see by rewording it: Every driver who gets arrested has broken the law.

(C) The notion that every scientist who is supported by a government grant will be successful is absurd, as one can see by rewording it: No scientist who is successful is so without a government grant.

(D) The notion that every scientist who is supported by a government grant will be successful is absurd, as one can see by rewording it: No scientist lacking governmental support will be successful.

(E) The notion that every scientist who has been supported by a government grant will be successful is absurd, as one can see by rewording it: No scientist is allowed to do research without a government grant.

答案是a
首先原文的意思大概是※※是荒谬的，只要国家不允许它就不会支持的
然后呢就被曲解为，国家不支持它就不会被允许的
而答案A中就有一个问题我想不清楚
开始是是※※是荒谬的：只要司机没有被抓就没有违法
可得出的结论是只要违法就会被抓
原文可以理解为逆命题，可答案就成了逆否命题了，这种逻辑关系对吗

16. Essayist: Wisdom and intelligence are desirable qualities. However, being intelligent does not imply that one is wise, nor does being wise imply that one is intelligent. In my own experience, the people I meet have one or the other of these qualities but not both.

If the essayist's statements are true, them each of the following could be true EXCEPT:

(A) Most people are neither intelligent, nor wise.

(B) Most people are both intelligent and wise.

(C) No one is both wise and intelligent.

(D) No one is either wise or intelligent.

(E) Many people are intelligent and yet lack wisdom.

答案是D
我看完答案就觉得不对，明明是可以有人聪明有人明智的嘛，怎么会选D呢

大家帮帮俺

作者: 番茄炒蛋 时间: 2003-11-19 00:34
老朋友都来看看吧

作者: mythicalman 时间: 2003-11-19 01:24
16， read question once more "...except". Choose the wrong not right choice

22,我也有点迷糊。
但是我认为题干没有逻辑错误。一般我的经验是LSAT里没说flawed pattern or reasoning，那么原题干就没有错误。题干就是一般的三段论，不过把次序颠来倒去，还是原命题。A是逆否命题，但除了A别的都有逻辑错误。
另外请大侠分析一下这句话：

(c) the notion that every scientist who is supported by a government grant will be successful is absurd, as one can see by rewording it: no scientist who is successful is so without a government grant.

no 的作用是否定（scientist who is successful is so without a government grant）还是否定successful，i.e. scientist who is unsuccessful is so without a government support.

作者: 番茄炒蛋 时间: 2003-11-19 02:23
不好意思，我开始说错了，16题得B有问题，我觉得B和D都错，这题还有疑问

第二题no 的作用是否定scientist who is successful is so without a government grant

作者: mythicalman 时间: 2003-11-20 04:08
up
谁来看看22题

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-11-20 5:05:51编辑过]

作者: 番茄炒蛋 时间: 2003-11-22 00:55
大家帮帮忙咯

作者: mythicalman 时间: 2003-11-23 06:07
16 B没有错，因为essayist只是表达他认识的人。

22，NN快来看看

作者: 番茄炒蛋 时间: 2003-11-23 10:26
顶

作者: snow_mountain 时间: 2003-11-25 00:05
我的理解是，只要政府不支持，就是政府不允许。

no one is allowed to create art without a government subsidy. 感觉上象原话的逆否命题。

也是看了答案理解出来的，有没有高人有更好的解释？

作者: weiyu 时间: 2004-4-4 01:04
22

原文：不supportà不允许；允许àsupport (原命题，逆否命题)

A: not arrestedànot break; breakàarrested　（原命题，逆否命题）

B: not arrestedànot break; arrestedàbreak　（原命题，否命题）

C: supportedàsuccessful; successfulàsupported　（原命题，逆命题）

D: supportedàsuccessful; successfulàsupport　（原命题，逆命题）

E: supportedàsuccessful; researchàsupported (无关)

作者: delldell 时间: 2004-4-6 06:57

写写WEIYU, 这下清楚了, 实际是在考原命题的逆否命题, ABSURD有点迷惑人, 这里和曲解不曲解没有关系

B的错与对, 无法根据作者的论证来判断, 也就是说, 根据作者的片面经验无法得出B一定错, 而D的no one.....绝对化否定恰恰和作者的经验向孛

作者: laplata 时间: 2005-6-14 11:59

请教一下原文为什么是原命题和逆否命题？
我觉得是重复原命题？

这种DD一直搞不懂
请NN指导一下
或者有什么材料可以辅导这个的？

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)