看到987里面第103题(或者补充资料250-#125)
1. American productivity is declining in relation to Europe’s; the energy expended per unit of production in the
(A) as much as twice that expended in
(B) as much as twice that of
(C) up to two times of
(D) up to two times what West Germans expended(A)
(E) up to double the West German expenditure
答案是A,可是,总感觉as much as twice好奇怪,google了一下,出来78,000个结果。请教NN这个结构也是正确的吗?谢谢拉
版主NN,我看了关于这道题目的讨论,里面问了好几次这个问题但都没有人回答,我只好在这里单独发一遍了。不好意思啊!
绝对是可以的。
在as … as 的结构中,第一个as的前面可以加上表示倍数的词、或是某些副词修饰语:twice , ( three ) times , nearly , almost , just , exactly , not nearly(根本不), by no means(绝不), quite 等等。例如:
Asia is four tomes as large as Europe. 亚洲有欧洲的四倍大(亚洲比欧洲大三倍)。
自然也可以把倍数的词放在后面....
而且这道题目可以通过平行来排除bcde的...
今天再做CR的时候,又看到另一个as ... as的结构,我的脑子突然就不转了,想不清楚了,麻烦大家给我看看
Omega company mailed three times as many catelogs that did not mention the "made by hand" label as catalogs that did mention the label.
那么,到底是label的多,还是没有label的多啊?
超级蠢的问题,但是我真的有点晕了,麻烦各位了
谢谢
今天再做CR的时候,又看到另一个as ... as的结构,我的脑子突然就不转了,想不清楚了,麻烦大家给我看看
Omega company mailed three times as many
catelogs that did not mention the "made by hand" label
as catalogs that did mention the label.
那么,到底是label的多,还是没有label的多啊?
超级蠢的问题,但是我真的有点晕了,麻烦各位了
谢谢
我看着想说是没有label的是有label的三倍
这是CXD逻辑里面的一个道题目,CXD的解释是有label的是没有label的三倍,我实在是看晕了,大家帮着看看吧。谢谢拉
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |