ChaseDream

标题: 两个答案都很有道理啊 [打印本页]

作者: jdxf 时间: 2007-4-24 22:53
标题: 两个答案都很有道理啊

E的确是对的

但C有什么错呢？

GWD6-Q38:

Three large companies and seven small companies currently manufacture a product with potential military applications. If the government regulates the industry, it will institute a single set of manufacturing specifications to which all ten companies will have to adhere. In this case, therefore, since none of the seven small companies can afford to convert their production lines to a new set of manufacturing specifications, only the three large companies will be able to remain in business.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the author’s argument relies?

None of the three large companies will go out of business if the government does not regulate the manufacture of the product.
It would cost more to convert the production lines of the small companies to a new set of manufacturing specifications than it would to convert the production lines of the large companies.
Industry lobbyists will be unable to dissuade the government from regulating the industry.
Assembly of the product produced according to government manufacturing specifications would be more complex than current assembly procedures.
None of the seven small companies currently manufactures the product to a set of specifications that would match those the government would institute if the industry were to be regulated.

作者: wei_wangyan 时间: 2007-4-25 12:49

If the government regulates the industry, it will institute a single set of manufacturing specifications to which all ten companies will have to adhere.

是在讨论如果regualtes the industry的后果，而不是能否regualtes the industry。

作者: Prison_Break 时间: 2007-4-25 13:20
c 明显不对。

作者: Prison_Break 时间: 2007-4-25 13:21
文章讨论的是实施后的情况

作者: gonghao 时间: 2007-4-25 13:46
c ,which involves in lobbyist, is out of the scope.

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)