ChaseDream

标题: GWD 20-41 愣是没有看明白题目 谁给我解释一下 谢谢 [打印本页]
作者: soniashi    时间: 2007-4-17 18:50
标题: GWD 20-41 愣是没有看明白题目 谁给我解释一下 谢谢

Q41:

Magazine Publisher:  Our magazine does not have a liberal bias.  It is true that when a book review we had commissioned last year turned out to express distinctly conservative views, we did not publish it until we had also obtained a second review that took a strongly liberal position.  Clearly, however, our actions demonstrate not a bias in favor of liberal views but rather a commitment to a balanced presentation of diverse opinions.

 

Determining which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the cogency of the magazine publisher’s response?

 

  1. Whether any other magazines in which the book was reviewed carried more than one review of the book
  2. Whether the magazine publishes unsolicited book reviews as well as those that it has commissioned
  3. Whether in the event that a first review commissioned by the magazine takes a clearly liberal position the magazine would make any efforts to obtain further reviews
  4. Whether the book that was the subject of the two reviews was itself written from a clearly conservative or a clearly liberal point of view
  5. Whether most of the readers of the magazine regularly read the book reviews that the magazine publishes

   Answer: C

作者: soniashi    时间: 2007-4-18 11:59

没人管我 我自己顶一下吧

。。。。。。。

作者: gonghao    时间: 2007-4-19 12:48

Magazine Publisher:  Our magazine does not have a liberal bias.  It is true that when a book review we had commissioned last year turned out to express distinctly conservative views, we did not publish it until we had also obtained a second review that took a strongly liberal position.  Clearly, however, our actions demonstrate not a bias in favor of liberal views but rather a commitment to a balanced presentation of diverse opinions.

杂志没有自由主义的偏见。确实，去年是有一篇评论有明显的保守主义（可以显示出对自由主义的偏见）观点但是杂志社拿到了第二篇（有自由主义观点的）评论后后才出版的。杂志社的意思是，他们不偏心的，因为他们的杂志出版的文章一般都是有两种观点，所以他们的行为是不存在偏见的而是在不同的观点间寻找平衡【单独的事件推出一个整体的结论】

C：Whether in the event that a first review commissioned by the magazine takes a clearly liberal position the magazine would make any efforts to obtain further reviews

杂志写好第一篇评论的时候是否真的尝试争取更多的其他的评论呢？【是否总体也是一样操作】

如果是，那结论就成立。

如果不是，那结论就不成立。

作者: soniashi    时间: 2007-4-19 14:52

好感动地说 谢谢哦

作者: zxygtx    时间: 2009-3-3 21:34

我的理解如下：

题目的意思是说改杂志说，先有了个保守的view,为了寻求平衡，（而不是对某种观点有倾向性）我们才找自由主义观点的。

C选项说：既然你是为了寻求平衡，而不是倾向于某种偏好的观点。那么如果你第一篇拿到的是自由主义立场，那么你会不会再寻求更多的观点（即如果是真是为了寻求平衡的话，它应该会去寻求conservative的观点的。）





欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3