ChaseDream

标题: [求助]og10-1 [打印本页]

作者: summerx    时间: 2007-4-2 21:18
标题: [求助]og10-1

1.  The Wallerstein study indicates that even after a decade young men and women still experience some of the effects of a divorce occurring when a child.

(A)  occurring when a child

(B)  occurring when children

(C)  that occurred when a child

(D)  that occurred when they were children

(E)   that has occurred as each was a child

Choice D is best. The phrasing a divorce that occurred when they were children correctly uses the relative clause that occurred to modify a divorce and includes a pronoun and verb (they were) that refer unambiguously to their antecedent, men and women. Choice A incorrectly introduces the when... phrase with occurring, thus illogically making divorce the grammatical referent of when a child; furthermore, the singular child does not agree with the plural men and women. B replaces child with children but otherwise fails to correct A's errors of structure and logic, and C corrects only the error created by occurring. Choice E includes an incorrect verb tense (has occurred) and wrongly replaces when with as. Also, each was does not properly refer to men and women.

请教:如何理解解释中的:Choice A incorrectly introduces the when... phrase with occurring, thus illogically making divorce the grammatical referent of when a child ? 这句话指出了什么错误啊 ?


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-4-2 21:53:44编辑过]

作者: Zeldaw    时间: 2007-4-2 22:06
我的理解是,A使得when a child修饰a divorce
作者: summerx    时间: 2007-4-3 10:37

谢谢楼上。但是这究竟属于哪类错误呢,还是不太理解。请指点






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3