ChaseDream

标题: T-3-Q24 [打印本页]

作者: windingcloud    时间: 2007-3-31 22:42
标题: T-3-Q24

1.         T-3-Q24.
                    

Each year red-winged blackbirds stop in a certain region of Midland
                    Province
on their spring and fall migration. In the fall, they eat a significant portion of the province’s sunflower crop. This year Midland farmers sought permits to set out small amounts of poisoned rice during the blackbirds’ spring stop in order to reduce the fall blackbird population. Some residents voiced concern that the rice could threaten certain species of rare migratory birds. Nevertheless, the wildlife agency approved the permits.

 

Which of the following, if true, most helps to justify the wildlife agency’s approval of the permits, given the concern voiced by some residents?

 

  1. In the region where the red-winged blackbirds stop, they are the first birds to be present in the spring.

  2. The poison that farmers want to use does not kill birds but rather make them incapable of producing viable eggs.

  3. Since rice is not raised in midland province, few species of birds native to the province normally eat rice.

  4. Without the permit, any farmers shown to have set out poison for the blackbirds would be heavily fined

  5. The poison that farmers got approval to use has no taste or smell that would make it detectable by birds.

答案选A,C为何不对?


作者: gonghao    时间: 2007-3-31 22:51

the concerns of Some residents  is the threathen to certain species of rare migratory birds

C is concering the situations of native birds that are never disscussed in this thread.


作者: jassonw    时间: 2008-6-11 09:51
a为什么是对的,那位能解释一下
作者: coralreef    时间: 2008-6-11 10:25

residents' concern is the rice could threaten certain species of rare migratory birds. Red-winged blackbirds are the first birds present in springthey .If they eat all the posisoned rice, afterwards, certain species of rare migratory birds won't be harmed.


作者: lychee1842    时间: 2008-12-21 00:41
楼上的解释太强大了,严重感谢!
作者: 伊布拉莫维琨    时间: 2009-7-18 08:47

作者: 伊布拉莫维琨    时间: 2009-7-18 08:49

作者: 伊布拉莫维琨    时间: 2009-7-18 08:50
但要是 没全部吃完呢?? 谁也没法保证全部吃完啊 那别的鸟还是会遭到损害啊
作者: 伊布拉莫维琨    时间: 2009-7-18 16:12

作者: boum    时间: 2009-7-30 12:13
up
作者: boum    时间: 2009-7-30 12:15

就是说,感觉a答案还是有点牵强,不过其他的都不对,也不得不选a


作者: 伊布拉莫维琨    时间: 2009-7-30 21:43

作者: opos    时间: 2009-8-3 11:41
受教了
作者: VivienZheng    时间: 2009-8-23 14:37
觉得a牵强~~
作者: OHHHHH    时间: 2009-8-29 11:24

请问为什么B不对呀?


作者: amumu    时间: 2009-8-31 16:16
rare migratory 不就是 native的意思吗?

A的问题是:如果没有吃完,其他鸟还是要遭殃啊! 

作者: kejuncheng    时间: 2009-9-10 23:57

就是说,首批到达的把毒药都吃干净,后边来的就没事啦


作者: tobytao    时间: 2009-10-22 23:30
以下是引用amumu在2009/8/31 16:16:00的发言:
rare migratory 不就是 native的意思吗?

A的问题是:如果没有吃完,其他鸟还是要遭殃啊! 

rarely migratory birds 才是native birds,呵呵。查了字典。


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/10/22 23:46:51编辑过]

作者: elfking1234    时间: 2012-10-7 14:58
rare migratory birds是“稀有的候鸟”,断句应该断成rare    migratory birds
作者: pandrew    时间: 2015-7-14 19:57
tobytao 发表于 2009-10-22 23:30
以下是引用amumu在2009/8/31 16:16:00的发言:rare migratory 不就是 native的意思吗?A的问题是:如 ...

这个太赞了!!!




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3