ChaseDream

标题: 请教og29题（大全698题？） [打印本页]
作者: gavinreal    时间: 2003-11-8 00:24
标题: 请教og29题（大全698题？）
In three centries-from1050 to 1350-several million tons of stone were quarried in France for the building of eighty cathedrals,five hundreded large churches,and some tens of thousands of parish churches.
og答案给的解释中说该题的选项B\C\E中的they无指代对象，可是我觉得明显是stone啊，而且were也说明是可以用they来指代的啊，谢谢！
作者: gemj    时间: 2003-11-8 00:53
they不能指代单数stone。要指代也应该是tons。
作者: xiaoyue45084508    时间: 2003-12-16 11:41
they might build 采用的是主动语态，而stone不能自己修建建筑物，而应该是被用来修。
作者: cocoabean    时间: 2004-4-13 10:53
thanks NN
作者: juliahom1121    时间: 2004-9-18 16:10

29.   In three centuries—from 1050 to 1350—several million tons of stone were quarried in France for the building of eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and some tens of thousands of parish churches.


(A) for the building of eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and some


(B) in order that they might build eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and some


(C) so as they might build eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and some


(D) so that there could be built eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and（A）


(E) such that they could build eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and


在这里building是集合名词吗？还有some tens of thousands of parish churches这里some和tens of thousands of连用还是跳跃修饰churches？

作者: hougang    时间: 2004-11-12 22:06

It looks to me that the word, some, modifies tens of thousands of ...

If some modifies churches, it will be awkward, because there has already been tens of thousands of churches.

作者: karen125    时间: 2005-1-1 21:50

这里的some应该作“大概、大约”，修饰tens of thousands of吧！

哪位解释一下the building of...？实在搞不领清啊！

作者: wwwweng    时间: 2005-1-1 22:45

building:建设，动名词

the building of A,B,C

作者: karen125    时间: 2005-1-2 14:05
以下是引用wwwweng在2005-1-1 22:45:00的发言：

building:建设，动名词


the building of A,B,C



动名词前面能加 the 么？
作者: karen125    时间: 2005-1-9 12:16
顶
作者: 卡维纳吉    时间: 2005-1-9 12:36

以下是引用karen125在2005-1-1 21:50:00的发言：

这里的some应该作“大概、大约”，修饰tens of thousands of吧！


哪位解释一下the building of...？实在搞不领清啊！


有两类动词, 一类是有"动作性名词"的动词,(例如: distribute---->distribution,assign---->assignment)


另一类是没有对应的"动作性名词"的动词,比如build.


(注意:"动名词"不等于"动作性名词")


对于第二类动词,就应该用 the+ doing+ of 来代替他的"动作性名词".


我的解释不知道你是否明白. 你可以看看白勇那本书的178页52题


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-9 12:38:30编辑过]
作者: juningw    时间: 2005-2-26 12:17
以下是引用卡维纳吉在2005-1-9 12:36:00的发言：



有两类动词, 一类是有"动作性名词"的动词,(例如: distribute---->distribution,assign---->assignment)


另一类是没有对应的"动作性名词"的动词,比如build.


(注意:"动名词"不等于"动作性名词")


对于第二类动词,就应该用 the+ doing+ of 来代替他的"动作性名词".


我的解释不知道你是否明白. 你可以看看白勇那本书的178页52题





不对。the building在这儿就是名词，意思是“建筑物”，而不是动名词。如果是动名词，那ETS肯定应该说...to build eighty...。


一家之言。

作者: sabrina_t    时间: 2005-4-26 21:24
以下是引用juningw在2005-2-26 12:17:00的发言：



不对。the building在这儿就是名词，意思是“建筑物”，而不是动名词。如果是动名词，那ETS肯定应该说...to build eighty...。


一家之言。


I think here building should not be 建筑物, otherwise, should used buildings, coz" of eightycathedrals..."


作者: sensornet    时间: 2005-4-30 17:20
building 肯定不是 建筑物的意思。因为前面的时间状语说了from 1050 to 1350,用分词表示了动作的持续性。肯定不能用to build, 不定式表现不出持续性。

作者: peajack    时间: 2005-5-18 16:36
the building :（教堂的）建筑
作者: foreinter    时间: 2005-6-23 17:31
以下是引用gemj在2003-11-8 0:53:00的发言：
they不能指代单数stone。要指代也应该是tons。

build 的动作不是stone 发出的，应该是人build才对

作者: babypace    时间: 2005-7-21 22:05
og的解释里没有说到D，大家能把D所有的问题都找下吗？谢谢。
作者: goodwish    时间: 2005-8-3 14:42

The mistake in D: So that there could be ...., what is the subject in the sentence?

作者: fuyun    时间: 2005-9-14 00:12
以下是引用peajack在2005-5-18 16:36:00的发言：
the building :（教堂的）建筑


longman对于building的解释之一，用在这题里合适


the process or business of building things


There is a limited supply of land for building. stone, timber, and other building materials
building of
The enquiry recommended the building of a tunnel.



作者: oceanalma    时间: 2005-10-1 00:16
以下是引用goodwish在2005-8-3 14:42:00的发言：

The mistake in D: So that there could be ...., what is the subject in the sentence?


有道理，og经常说没有there is no identifi­able agent responsible for .....现在记住了

作者: seraphblue    时间: 2005-10-13 08:19
嗯，the process of building things听起来很有道理，同意！
作者: hitlzc    时间: 2005-12-14 19:43
以下是引用gemj在2003-11-8 0:53:00的发言：
they不能指代单数stone。要指代也应该是tons。


？？？


一直搞不太清楚A of B哪个是中心词?

作者: daydaysun    时间: 2005-12-15 16:15

楼上的mm可以参考这个帖子 http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&replyid=497768&id=57162&page=1&skin=0&Star=1 stoneren的论述


a of b结构的核心词是a，但是本题中不是a of b结构，tons of stone有点像量词，偶也认为og说缺乏语法指代对象是不太正确的。

作者: daydaysun    时间: 2005-12-15 16:19

偶倒有个问题，C选项，如果改写成 so as to build 是否可以？


1.        In three centuries—from 1050 to 1350—several million tons of stone were quarried in France so as to build eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and some tens of thousands of parish churches.



build的逻辑主语是人，so as to 前面were quarried的逻辑主语也是人，逻辑主语应该是一致的，不知道是否可以？请指教

作者: nirvana0211    时间: 2005-12-17 14:22

觉得不行，were quarried得主语是stone，不能跟build





欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3