It has recently been discovered that many attributions of paintings to the seventeenth-century Dutch artist Rembrandt may be false. The contested paintings are not minor works, whose removal from the Rembrandt corpus would leave it relatively unaffected: they are at its very center. In her recent book, Svetlana Alpers uses these cases of disputed attribution as a point of departure for her provocative discussion of the radical distinctiveness of Rembrandt's approach to paintings.
很难明白这段话的意思,为什么前面说not minor后面又是unaffected呢?
这难道不是矛盾的吗?希望聪明的人指点我一下,谢谢
The contested paintings are NOT minor works.
Minor works' removal ---> relatively unaffected.
The contested paitings "are at its very center", and the removal of them does affect.
ogod~ thank u so much, it's ur first answer
quite appreciated for ur clear thoughts~
i c
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |