ChaseDream

标题: 质疑GWD30-q20的答案,大家一起来讨论一下 [打印本页]

作者: Zeldaw    时间: 2007-3-20 21:58
标题: 质疑GWD30-q20的答案,大家一起来讨论一下

GWD30-q20

Researchers have announced that the magnetic fields emitted by one manufacturer’s security surveillance system, of which type there are 200,000 worldwide, can interfere with pacemakers and that this interaction can bring on missed or irregular heartbeats, nausea, breathlessness, dizziness, and even fainting

  1. of which type there are 200,000 worldwide, can interfere with pacemakers and that
  2. of which, worldwide, there are 200,000 of that type, and which can interfere with pacemakers, and
  3. of which type there are 200,000 worldwide, they can interfere with pacemakers and
  4. 200,000 of which type exist worldwide, interfering with pacemakers, and
  5. 200,000 of that type existing worldwide and can interfere with pacemakers, and

给的答案是D,其实我觉得应该是A

理由如下:1:如果选D,那么magnetic fields没有谓语,而A:of which type there are 200,000 worldwide, can interfere with pacemakers and that

                     can interfere是谓语

 2:题目中

Researchers have announced that the magnetic fields emitted by one manufacturer’s security surveillance system, of which type there are 200,000 worldwide, can interfere with pacemakers and that this interaction can bring on missed or irregular heartbeats, nausea, breathlessness, dizziness, and even fainting.

这里this interaction can bringthe magnetic field ..................can interfere 平行

3:A:of which type there are 200,000 worldwide, can interfere with pacemakers and that

      这里  that可以使结构更加清楚:announced that ................and that

大家一起看看是不是这样:)


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-3-20 22:47:54编辑过]

作者: 就醉一生    时间: 2007-3-20 22:51

D:少了that

我也支持A,A表达不好,只能算小错。

希望高手指点


作者: mbamom    时间: 2007-3-20 23:05

支持A,

D如果去掉中间的修饰成分,就是Researchers have announced that the magnetic fields, and this interaction can bring...当然不对
            


作者: fionajiang    时间: 2007-3-21 00:58
支持A,GMAT对平行的要求还是很苛刻的
作者: independence    时间: 2007-3-22 00:53

支持A

D没有谓语Researchs have announced that the magnetic fields emitted by one manufacturer's security surveillance system interfering with pacemakers, and .......


作者: YY_lalala    时间: 2007-4-11 22:54
another vote for A
作者: yulinling    时间: 2007-4-12 06:00
A
作者: colorful_na    时间: 2007-7-15 20:14
up
作者: seastone    时间: 2007-7-16 09:42

支持A


作者: zhrjia    时间: 2007-7-17 14:42
D)is correct
Researchers have announced that the magnetic fields ...and this interaction can bring...
the magnetic fields ...and this interaction 是 announced 从句的主语,中间的都是插入语,起补充说明的作用

作者: diyin    时间: 2007-7-17 15:03

支持A。主要是D没有谓语并且后面的宾语从句平行应该重复that.


作者: cyber0708    时间: 2007-7-17 15:29
我也支持A。只能说a不是那么很标准而已,而d是谓语动词的形式不对吧。拙见。。。。
作者: plato1983    时间: 2007-7-17 17:17
以下是引用zhrjia在2007-7-17 14:42:00的发言:
D)is correct
Researchers have announced that the magnetic fields ...and this interaction can bring...
the magnetic fields ...and this interaction 是 announced 从句的主语,中间的都是插入语,起补充说明的作用
支持A,D句意逻辑比较awkward!
作者: isa0709    时间: 2007-9-2 10:26

支持A


作者: snowofjune    时间: 2007-12-16 10:17
up,
作者: sch    时间: 2008-2-23 22:54
以下是引用zhrjia在2007-7-17 14:42:00的发言:
D)is correct
Researchers have announced that the magnetic fields ...and this interaction can bring...
the magnetic fields ...and this interaction 是 announced 从句的主语,中间的都是插入语,起补充说明的作用

 D这个就是硬凑平行结构.

1,但是主语如果变成了 magnetic fields 和 this interaction,逻辑意思就不对了.

2,况且,this interaction来源于什么?来源于interfering with这个分词结构.   哪有把前面noun 1的修饰作用的东西拿出来,当作noun2,再把两个名词并列的.大家读读就觉得很别扭了.这2个名词并列在一起. 换句话说,修饰成分是可以去掉的,而当我们去掉第一个名词的 修饰成分以后,那么后一个名词this interfection就变得突然没有依靠了,很突兀. this interfection?哪个interfection?前面没有提到过!

3, D中,which修饰M field,后面又套个分词结构,如果这是句尾,也就罢了,而这叠加的双重修饰,后面又跟上一个名词2,名词1的修饰成分叠加,不好.


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-2-23 22:57:07编辑过]

作者: yzhao26    时间: 2009-4-9 09:08

but OA (official answer) is D


[此贴子已经被作者于2009-4-9 9:28:45编辑过]

作者: jupiter410    时间: 2009-10-8 22:39
up
作者: yiyun2    时间: 2009-10-8 23:04
上网search过 外国一些论坛也是vote A 
但是也有人说OA(official answer) 是D, 想知道这个OA是哪里来的呢?能确实不?

作者: paopao1124    时间: 2010-6-7 13:51
我认为d的结构没问题
反而a中说 of which type there are 200,000 worldwide ,没有d中的 200,000 of which type exist worldwide 简洁
作者: crazyxxx    时间: 2010-6-7 15:04
个人支持d
1. exist用法简单有效
2. this interaction是对前面"xxx emit yyy interfering zzz"的总结,逻辑合理
3. and前与and后的两句句子其实逻辑上是统一并且联系紧密地,所以不需要用两个宾语从句.所以that也不需要了
作者: keith139    时间: 2010-7-5 01:41
oa是a,最新的gmat instructor给的答案




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3