ChaseDream

标题: 16号一道JJ的争议！不重视的会吃亏哦 [打印本页]

作者: 动力火锅 时间: 2007-3-16 23:58
标题: 16号一道JJ的争议！不重视的会吃亏哦

1. GWD-5-Q30:

Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage. However, it also lowers the nutritional value of many foods. For example, irradiation destroys a significant percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain. Proponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking. However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since _______.

many of the proponents of irradiation are food distributors who gain from food’s having a longer shelf life
it is clear that killing bacteria that may be present on food is not the only effect that irradiation has
cooking is usually the final step in preparing food for consumption, whereas irradiation serves to ensure a longer shelf life for perishable foods
certain kinds of cooking are, in fact, even more destructive of vitamin B1 than carefully controlled irradiation is
for food that is both irradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1 associated with either process individually is compounded

E，有争议选C

NN们来指点一下，C和E 哪个更好

作者: myoo 时间: 2007-3-17 00:03
既然已经争议那么长时间都没有定论，就按照自己的想法做吧

作者: juliac 时间: 2007-3-17 00:12
我做这题的时候想也没想就是E，因为：平时想了这么久了也没个定论，当场想也不太会有结果了。况且，能碰到这题，说明做的还不错，所以就算做不出来心里也舒服了。汗，我好象很没有追求的样子。

作者: tootoo5478 时间: 2007-3-17 01:25
選E吧~~~

作者: cosette 时间: 2007-3-17 15:42

E说出了两种方法消耗的VB会复合就是说用irra营养又多消灭了一次的意思吧

C好像只说出来两种方法的分别用法对VB的伤害没说

应该选E吧

作者: nutliu 时间: 2007-3-17 19:28

选E，有争议吗？

问的是基于this fact（A至少比B好） is misleading since

如果B也很差，就不能说明A不差，除非B很好

E选项说明A的到来并没有改变B也很差的事实（AB独立合在一起只能是更差）

表达的不好，反正我看着就觉得C无关

作者: 寒露 时间: 2007-3-17 22:01
我也记得这题没争议啊。同意选E

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)