找了半天没找到电子版，只有口述一下大致内容了，讲的是国有企业私有化进程，另外生产力的提高源于工人参与控股分红，最后引用了汤母斯,佩恩的一句格言：“what we obtain too cheap we esteem too lightly”偶觉得这句话很经典呢。废话不说了，烦请有紫皮的大牛们帮忙看看这个题目：
86. It can be inferred from the passage that the author considers labor disruptions to be
A.an inevitable problem in a weak national econoy
B.a positive sign of employee concern about a company
C.a predictor of employee reactions to a company's offer to sell shares to them
D.a phenomenon found more often in state-owned industries than in private companies
E.a beterrence to high performance levels in an industry
我个人觉得D和E都是备选答案
E肯定是对的，但是D看来看去也觉得有可能
因为私有化使得国有企业变少，如果D情况存在的话（作者的assume）则罢工就变少了，跟原文一致，我怎么觉得自己想不出排除的原因
请问各位牛牛是怎么排除D的呢
找到了，贴出文章，希望好心人帮忙一下
While there is no blueprint for transforming a largely government-controlled economy into a free one，the experience of the United Kingdom since 1979 clearly shows one approach that works：privatization，in which state—owned industries are sold to private companies．By 1979，the total borrowings and losses of state—owned industries were running at about￡3 billion a year. By selling many of these industries，the government has decreased these borrowings and losses，gained over￡34 billion from the sales, and now receives tax revenues from the newly privatized companies． Along with a dramatically improved overall economy，the government has been able to repay 12．5 percent of the net national debt over a two-year period．
In fact, privatization has not only rescued individual industries and a whole economy headed for disaster, but has also raised the level of performance in every area．At British Airways and British Gas，for example，productivity per employee has risen by 20 percent．At Associated British Ports，labor disruptions common in the
Part of this improved productivity has come about because the employees of privatized industries were given the opportunity to buy shares in their own companies．They responded enthusiastically to the offer of shares：at British Aerospace，89 percent of the eligible work force bought shares；at Associated British Ports，90 percent；and at British Telecom，92 percent． When people have a personal stake in something，they think about it，care about it，work to make it prosper. At the National Freight Consortium，the new employee—owners grew so concerned about their company's profits that during wage negotiations they actually pressed their union to lower its wage demands．
Some economists have suggested that giving away free shares would provide a needed acceleration of the privatization process．Yet they miss Thomas Paine's point that＂what we obtain too cheap we esteem too lightly．”In order for the far—ranging benefits of individual ownership to be achieved by owners l companies I and countries employees and other individuals must make their own decisions to buy, and they must commit some of their own resources to the choice．
Quote from OG:
D Labor disruptions in state-owned and private industries are not compared.
I think the explaination makes it clearly that we should exclude the wrong selections containing those not-mentioned stuff--labor discruotuin in stated owned company and private company is not compared in the passage. Additionally, the key point(1st sentence) in the second paragraph is to tell readers, the privatization process enhances the opreation performance of companies. The labor discruption is just cited as sample to support the main idea. Taking it further, understanding passage structure plays a great role to judge what the question is asking about and definitely helps us to find the correct answer efficiently.
Just my 2 cents and hope it helps.
嗯 那倒是 俺第一次做这题 和LZ你想得一样哩 后来看了好几题都是因为OG上说* and * are not compared 才发现自己想多了……
我选得也是D啊，反正OG的解释让我不能信服
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |