14. Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm others as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person’s decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?
(A) Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.
(B) Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.
(C) Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.
(D) The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat-belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.（B）
(E) In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.
答案是B，请问一下E有什么错误呢？
E并没有削弱呀 not wear seat belts受伤的比wear seat belts多,只是一个事实。
题目说：法律规定所有司机都要系安全带，反对这个法律的人argue说，在一个自由的社会，人们有权利选择要不要冒险，只要他没有伤害他人的利益。因此他们认为每个人都有权利自己决定要不要系安全带。
B说，没有系安全带的人使受伤的人能增多，从而增加了保险费，而系安全带的人也要交纳同样高额的保险费，所以这种自己决定要不要系安全带的行为损害了他人的利益，因此削弱。
不系安全带的后果就是居高不下的支付车险的费用
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |