ChaseDream
标题: 885-14-8 [打印本页]
作者: joywzy 时间: 2003-11-5 19:11
标题: 885-14-8
8. Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, capitalized on her keen observation and love of the natural world.
(A) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives,
(B) In her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(C) In her book illustrations, which she carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(D) Carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations
(E) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinated them with her narratives and
答案：C，请问其它选项哪里不好了？谢谢。
作者: gemj 时间: 2003-11-5 19:55
A、B中的coordinating的逻辑主语有被误解为illustrations的嫌疑。
D中coordinated的动作对象是Beatrix Potter。
E读起来没有C爽吧？结构上显得笨拙，意思上也有些别扭。
作者: joywzy 时间: 2003-11-5 19:57
以下是引用gemj在2003-11-5 19:55:00的发言：
E读起来没有C爽吧？结构上显得笨拙，意思上也有些别扭。
gemj,为什么说意思别扭啊？结构笨拙？？？能再讲讲吗？
作者: gemj 时间: 2003-11-5 20:23
个人感觉。觉得它与作者想表达的意思不相符合。
我觉得C表达的挺到位。
作者: joywzy 时间: 2003-11-5 20:29
以下是引用gemj在2003-11-5 20:23:00的发言：
个人感觉。觉得它与作者想表达的意思不相符合。
我觉得C表达的挺到位。
怎么不相符合了？E上没有什么歧义，该表达的也表达到了。
作者: joywzy 时间: 2003-11-5 22:40
gemj,再瞧瞧E，可好？
作者: gemj 时间: 2003-11-5 22:47
我觉得E把本来属于附属的成份carefully coordinated them with her narratives 变成了主干成份并列谓语。
虽然原句的意思未必正确，但我觉得C中把它作为非限定性定语从句which she carefully coordinated with her narratives要好一些。
再说什么大道理也没有了，个人感觉吧！
作者: 深海的小美人鱼 时间: 2003-11-5 22:57
我认为这里存在一个表达意思的主次问题。这句话的重点是说capitalized on her keen observation and love of the natural world.
而carefully coordinated them with her narratives是修饰book的定语。如果把两个等同起来，象E那样，有些改变句意。而GMAT最好不要改变原文的句意。
作者: joywzy 时间: 2003-11-5 23:46
谢谢鱼鱼和gemj.
作者: joywzy 时间: 2003-11-6 07:31
以下是引用深海的小美人鱼在2003-11-5 22:57:00的发言：
我认为这里存在一个表达意思的主次问题。这句话的重点是说capitalized on her keen observation and love of the natural world.
而carefully coordinated them with her narratives是修饰book的定语。如果把两个等同起来，象E那样，有些改变句意。而GMAT最好不要改变原文的句意。
再问一下，你怎么就知道句子是主从，而不是并列呢？从何得知啊？
谢谢。
作者: joywzy 时间: 2003-11-6 10:39
以下是引用joywzy在2003-11-6 7:31:00的发言：
再问一下，你怎么就知道句子是主从，而不是并列呢？从何得知啊？
谢谢。
同志们,再看看啦.
作者: oldreaper 时间: 2003-11-20 00:34
以下是引用joywzy在2003-11-5 19:11:00的发言：
8. Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, capitalized on her keen observation and love of the natural world.
(A) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives,
(B) In her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(C) In her book illustrations, which she carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(D) Carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations
(E) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinated them with her narratives and
答案：C，请问其它选项哪里不好了？谢谢。
现在分词修饰，如果前面有‘，‘ 一般放在句前或句尾做状语。 凡在句中间肯定做定语，一般也不再前面加‘，‘ 做差入语状，但是价也不能算错。做定语时有先修饰前面结构中的主词， 所以A, B 中都修饰 illastration错！
D, 不用细讲，过去分词。
E, 中的them有问题， 代词一般指代主句结构中的主词， 而这里指代了插入成分中的词，就会让人别扭，除非有中间有成分能够跳接这种指代关系。Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations that she spend most time on them, carefully coordinated them with her narratives and
作者: joywzy 时间: 2003-11-20 10:00
E:讲的是代词的问题.
对啊.谢谢oldreaper.
作者: annawj 时间: 2005-3-20 18:36
关于oldreaper的“现在分词修饰，如果前面有‘，‘ 一般放在句前或句尾做状语。 凡在句中间肯定做定语，一般也不再前面加‘，‘ 做差入语状，但是价也不能算错。做定语时有先修饰前面结构中的主词， 所以A, B 中都修饰 illastration错！”
1）"如果前面有‘，‘ 一般放在句前或句尾做状语",都有“，”怎么放在句前啊？
2）所指的主词是？
3）“做差入语状，但是价也不能算错”怎么理解？
请多指教，谢谢
作者: ford424 时间: 2005-3-22 23:42
D怎么错了,为什么我没看出来啊?
作者: xiao_zhutou 时间: 2005-6-13 01:11
D: coordinated with her narratives 修饰 Beatrix Potter，逻辑不通。
作者: Avantasia 时间: 2005-7-3 00:10
以下是引用oldreaper在2003-11-20 0:34:00的发言：
现在分词修饰，如果前面有‘，‘ 一般放在句前或句尾做状语。 凡在句中间肯定做定语，一般也不再前面加‘，‘ 做差入语状，但是价也不能算错。做定语时有先修饰前面结构中的主词， 所以A, B 中都修饰 illastration错！
D, 不用细讲，过去分词。
E, 中的them有问题， 代词一般指代主句结构中的主词， 而这里指代了插入成分中的词，就会让人别扭，除非有中间有成分能够跳接这种指代关系。Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations that she spend most time on them, carefully coordinated them with her narratives and
这个说法真的很新颖, 不知道还有没有其它的例证?
作者: mildsevens 时间: 2005-7-14 10:07
我怎么觉着C不顺眼呢，which在从句中到底做什么成分？是with的宾语吗？
而且我记得OG上明确说过，介词短语里不能带从句，那C到底有没有这些错误呢？
还有，in her book illustrations这种用法怎么感觉怪怪的
请不吝赐教，谢谢
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-7-14 10:09:27编辑过]
作者: fr6102790 时间: 2005-7-14 12:15
再贴一遍原题
8. Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, capitalized on her keen observation and love of the natural world.(P2 F-2)
(A) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives,
(B) In her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(C) In her book illustrations, which she carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(D) Carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations（C）
(E) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinated them with her narratives and
C项中WHICH修饰前面的illustrations,C项意思为BP在她的书的插图中(该插图与其描述相对应),BP运用了尖锐的观察和对自然的热爱.
其中,which从句是个典型的非限制性定语从句.
To be discussed... ...
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-7-14 12:29:56编辑过]
作者: mildsevens 时间: 2005-7-14 14:26
以下是引用fr6102790在2005-7-14 12:15:00的发言：再贴一遍原题
8. Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, capitalized on her keen observation and love of the natural world.(P2 F-2)
(A) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives,
(B) In her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(C) In her book illustrations, which she carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(D) Carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations（C）
(E) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinated them with her narratives and
C项中WHICH修饰前面的illustrations,C项意思为BP在她的书的插图中(该插图与其描述相对应),BP运用了尖锐的观察和对自然的热爱.
其中,which从句是个典型的非限制性定语从句.
To be discussed...
我明白你的意思，问题在于，which后面是一个完整句子，如果是定从的话，因此要么前面缺介词，要么从句里有多余的成分。
而且coordinate的主语是谁？或者说，到底是什么coordinated with narratives。逻辑上说，应该是illustrations. 因此，如果按照你中文的翻译的话，应该是.... illustrations, which was carefully coordinated with narratives。。。
这也是我看C不舒服的理由。
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-7-14 14:28:10编辑过]
作者: fr6102790 时间: 2005-7-15 10:48
标题: to explan my idea in details
我明白你的意思，问题在于，which后面是一个完整句子，如果是定从的话，因此要么前面缺介词，要么从句里有多余的成分。
而且coordinate的主语是谁？或者说，到底是什么coordinated with narratives。逻辑上说，应该是illustrations. 因此，如果按照你中文的翻译的话，应该是.... illustrations, which was carefully coordinated with narratives。。。
重新写一下原句:
In her book illustrations, which she carefully coordinated with her narratives,
在这个从句中,she 为主语, carefully coordinated which with her narratives为谓语部分, which做宾语的一部分;
这样解释,能说的通吗?
即she coordinated A with B,she 发出coordinatd这一动作,是人使illustration使narrative 相符合,但中文解释是后面两个名词互相印证.
To be discussed... ...
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-7-15 11:06:30编辑过]
作者: mildsevens 时间: 2005-7-15 15:44
查了一下，coordinate是及物动词
谢谢楼上的
作者: zhoushao 时间: 2005-7-15 23:39
以下是引用oldreaper在2003-11-20 0:34:00的发言：
现在分词修饰，如果前面有‘，‘ 一般放在句前或句尾做状语。 凡在句中间肯定做定语，一般也不再前面加‘，‘ 做差入语状，但是价也不能算错。做定语时有先修饰前面结构中的主词， 所以A, B 中都修饰 illastration错！
D, 不用细讲，过去分词。
E, 中的them有问题， 代词一般指代主句结构中的主词， 而这里指代了插入成分中的词，就会让人别扭，除非有中间有成分能够跳接这种指代关系。Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations that she spend most time on them, carefully coordinated them with her narratives and
E的解释我还是很疑惑，大家在有没有其他解释
作者: fr6102790 时间: 2005-7-16 11:40
个人认为oldreaper对them的说法有失偏颇,E项主要错在无端改变句子中心及句意较为冗长.
作者: amacd 时间: 2005-9-28 14:22
still feel quite confused with this question,
1. Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, capitalized on her keen observation and love of the natural world.
(A) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives,
(B) In her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(C) In her book illustrations, which she carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(D) Carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations（C）
(E) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinated them with her narratives and
for B) does "coordinating them" seem to lack a動作執行者?
and C)'s "she" fulfill that?
作者: RayBear 时间: 2005-11-23 23:56
同意oldreaper的看法。
作者: peterchang 时间: 2006-7-18 13:24
以下是引用oldreaper在2003-11-20 0:34:00的发言：以下是引用joywzy在2003-11-5 19:11:00的发言：
8. Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, capitalized on her keen observation and love of the natural world.
(A) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives,
(B) In her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(C) In her book illustrations, which she carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(D) Carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations
(E) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinated them with her narratives and
答案：C，请问其它选项哪里不好了？谢谢。
现在分词修饰，如果前面有‘，‘ 一般放在句前或句尾做状语。 凡在句中间肯定做定语，一般也不再前面加‘，‘ 做差入语状，但是价也不能算错。做定语时有先修饰前面结构中的主词， 所以A, B 中都修饰 illastration错！
D, 不用细讲，过去分词。
E, 中的them有问题， 代词一般指代主句结构中的主词， 而这里指代了插入成分中的词，就会让人别扭，除非有中间有成分能够跳接这种指代关系。Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations that she spend most time on them, carefully coordinated them with her narratives and 对于ｅ的说法是不是因为in her book illustrations是插入句，所以不能指代，但是OG11th #102也说them cannot refer to book illustrations because the plural noun is the object of the preposition，是因为介词的关系，有点搞不清，可否ｎｎ再解释一下，谢谢！！
作者: zlzlzl 时间: 2006-7-29 16:56
我感觉还是从意思着手，原文应该表达的意思是：
In her book illustrations，Beatrix Potter capitalized ......
而不是
Beatrix Potter, coordinated .....and capitalized
作者: gonghao 时间: 2006-8-9 23:11
汗呀
选了个E
C的介词为何不前置？似乎with which更合理些
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-8-9 23:14:03编辑过]
作者: amysarmy 时间: 2006-10-16 02:25
以下是引用gemj在2003-11-5 22:47:00的发言：
我觉得E把本来属于附属的成份carefully coordinated them with her narratives 变成了主干成份并列谓语。
虽然原句的意思未必正确，但我觉得C中把它作为非限定性定语从句which she carefully coordinated with her narratives要好一些。
再说什么大道理也没有了，个人感觉吧！
同意.....
我认为E的问题在于改变了句子的意思,原来的句子谓语动词只有一个,就是capitalized,
作者: 芷萱85 时间: 2007-4-7 15:16
按OG的解释C使得主语与谓语挨着 比较清晰
作者: huangyh03 时间: 2007-9-26 02:46
同意30楼观点，e改变了句子的重心，不好
作者: aug24 时间: 2008-2-16 20:55
D选项错在哪?为什么OG上说 carefully cooordinated....是修饰Beatrix Potter的?
谢谢
作者: mian328519 时间: 2008-5-9 21:32
回楼上，这是一个分词省略结构啊
作者: magicalkikyo 时间: 2008-9-13 11:39
我觉得那个coordinate的宾语不应该是illustraions么，但是前面的那个in……illustraions的结构，使得这种指代关系不明显甚至不成立@@
作者: starquake 时间: 2008-12-18 14:25
Thanks!
作者: xiaofan1016 时间: 2009-9-4 10:10
以下是引用fr6102790在2005/7/15 10:48:00的发言：重新写一下原句:
In her book illustrations, which she carefully coordinated with her narratives,
在这个从句中,she 为主语, carefully coordinated which with her narratives为谓语部分, which做宾语的一部分;
这样解释,能说的通吗?
即she coordinated A with B,she 发出coordinatd这一动作,是人使illustration使narrative 相符合,但中文解释是后面两个名词互相印证.
To be discussed... ...
讲得好！定语从句that 既可以做主语又可以做宾语 恶补语法知识啊
作者: struta 时间: 2009-11-12 02:42
up
作者: looniee 时间: 2010-9-9 04:44
我明白你的意思，问题在于，which后面是一个完整句子，如果是定从的话，因此要么前面缺介词，要么从句里有多余的成分。
而且coordinate的主语是谁？或者说，到底是什么coordinated with narratives。逻辑上说，应该是illustrations. 因此，如果按照你中文的翻译的话，应该是.... illustrations, which was carefully coordinated with narratives。。。
重新写一下原句:
In her book illustrations, which she carefully coordinated with her narratives,在这个从句中,she 为主语, carefully coordinated which with her narratives为谓语部分, which做宾语的一部分;这样解释,能说的通吗?即she coordinated A with B,she 发出coordinatd这一动作,是人使illustration使narrative 相符合,但中文解释是后面两个名词互相印证.To be discussed... ...
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-7-15 11:06:30编辑过]
-- by 会员 fr6102790 (2005/7/15 10:48:00)
感觉这个解释得好，谢谢！
作者: wy1990824 时间: 2011-8-5 12:09
[quote]
[quote]
我明白你的意思，问题在于，which后面是一个完整句子，如果是定从的话，因此要么前面缺介词，要么从句里有多余的成分。
而且coordinate的主语是谁？或者说，到底是什么coordinated with narratives。逻辑上说，应该是illustrations. 因此，如果按照你中文的翻译的话，应该是.... illustrations, which was carefully coordinated with narratives。。。
重新写一下原句:
In her book illustrations, which she carefully coordinated with her narratives,
在这个从句中,she 为主语, carefully coordinated which with her narratives为谓语部分, which做宾语的一部分;
这样解释,能说的通吗?
即she coordinated A with B,she 发出coordinatd这一动作,是人使illustration使narrative 相符合,但中文解释是后面两个名词互相印证.
To be discussed... ...
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-7-15 11:06:30编辑过]
-- by 会员 fr6102790 (2005/7/15 10:48:00)
几年之后，还是觉得这个好~~~
作者: germain 时间: 2017-4-30 23:29
同意！
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |