ChaseDream

标题: GWD-26-Q17看过讨论依旧不明白,求助 [打印本页]

作者: 雨薇    时间: 2007-3-7 15:04
标题: GWD-26-Q17看过讨论依旧不明白,求助

 

17. GWD-26-Q17

Responding to the public’s fascination with-and sometimes

undue alarm over-possible threats from asteroids, a scale

developed by astronomers rates the likelihood that a particular

asteroid or comet may collide with Earth.(这道题CD选项之间如何选择?)

A.      a scale developed by astronomers rates the likelihood

that a particular asteroid or comet may

B.      a scale that astronomers have developed rates how

likely it is for a particular asteroid or comet to

C.      astronomers have developed a scale to rate how likely

a particular asteroid or comet will be to

D.      astronomers have developed a scale for rating the

likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will

E.      astronomers have developed a scale that rates the

likelihood of a particular asteroid or comet that may.


作者: allfar    时间: 2007-3-7 19:33

be to +动词不定式中的be to用作情态习语, 这时的be to do表示: “计划”、“安排”、“义务”、“应该”、“可能”、“命运”等。

这样的话C的意义就重复了...

我感觉D更合适.


作者: 雨薇    时间: 2007-3-7 19:49
答案是c
作者: 雨薇    时间: 2007-3-7 21:40
up
作者: 就醉一生    时间: 2007-3-7 21:53
表目的性用to,足够排出D
作者: 雨薇    时间: 2007-3-8 11:56
up
作者: 遥远的绿洲    时间: 2007-3-8 12:06

用to表示目的

而for不能表示这个意思,因此C最能表达出原句的意思,宇航员制作scale为了去评估...


作者: amor924    时间: 2007-3-9 14:25

前面有likely, 转换为陈述语序:how a particular asteroid or comet will be to likely 这里to be有点像系表结果吧


作者: wwwtied    时间: 2007-8-31 11:43
be likely to do sth,这是习惯用法吧,支持c
作者: ashura    时间: 2008-1-9 12:02

搜索了一下,原句引自1999年的NY times

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E03E6DF1E3EF934A15754C0A96F958260

To help deal with public fascination -- and sometimes undue alarm -- about possible threats from asteroids, astronomers have adopted a scale that rates the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will collide with Earth.

看样子E最好。只有最后的may和原句的will不同。


作者: apostlep43    时间: 2008-1-9 13:35

I support D

1) "for" can also indicate purpose. EG. A Grant for studying medicine.

However, I am not sure whether "for" can be used in this case.

2) I think C is redundant because "will be to" is awkward. should be changed to "will collide"

3) I think E is also wrong because "likelihood of a particular asteroid or comet that may collide with earth" reader maybe confused and think that Likelihood will collide with Earth.


作者: raphael1234    时间: 2009-7-11 10:15
up
作者: raphael1234    时间: 2009-7-11 10:16
到底选什么...c还是d?
作者: scarlett8327    时间: 2009-7-18 12:49

support c


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/7/18 12:49:49编辑过]

作者: morethanword    时间: 2009-8-26 20:48

谁能帮我解释下E为什么不对呢? 就是因为likelihood和may语义重复吗?

我想确认一下

谢谢~


作者: morethanword    时间: 2009-8-27 23:17
up
作者: mars_cheung    时间: 2009-10-25 17:38
以下是引用ashura在2008/1/9 12:02:00的发言:

搜索了一下,原句引自1999年的NY times

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E03E6DF1E3EF934A15754C0A96F958260

To help deal with public fascination -- and sometimes undue alarm -- about possible threats from asteroids, astronomers have adopted a scale that rates the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will collide with Earth.

看样子E最好。只有最后的may和原句的will不同。

E 是不对的,the
            
likelihood of a particular asteroid or comet that may... 同位语从句明显缺少了动词,最后的一个 that 将likelihood 的动词变成comet定语从句的谓语,因此不可选


作者: mars_cheung    时间: 2009-10-25 17:55

这题我目前倾向选 C

to rate 优于 for rating,而且 will be (how) likely to do 的表达也十分常用

但对 D 存有疑问

rate the likelihood 的表达是否固定搭配,也就是说 rate the likelihood 是否优于 rate how likely

因为 rate 是估计、估值的意思,计算出一个具体的比率(likelihood)语义上说是优于计算出“多大可能”

希望大家继续讨论啊


作者: clarry    时间: 2009-10-25 18:53

C中的how likely will be是固定搭配will be likely to的倒装。强调前面的内容,故将how likely提前,be必须补出。另外用不定式来表示目地符合GMAC语言习惯。

(eg, Participants for the current study were presented with restaurant menus and asked to rate how likely they would be to eat at each restaurant.)

D中用for rating肯定从语法上是正确的:下面是几个GMAC的原句:

Although the government or industry usually sets minimum standards for transportation industries, no such standard has been set for qualifying to be an engineer on the train.

The data collected by weather airplanes that fly into the heart of a hurricane are useful mainly for gauging the storm’s structure and strength, not for the speed and the path of their movement.

Although some officials noted that using machines for farming in China costs more than traditional hand cultivation,...

但这里我认为选C,因为how likely明显能感觉到强烈的感情色彩。和前面的public’s fascination with-and sometimes

undue alarm over-possible threats 照应。表示出作者对这样的公众反应的态度,及问题的关心。而D,非常学术化的语言,不太能跟本句的感情对应。

undue alarm over-possible threats 照应。表示出作者对这样的公众反应的态度,及问题的关心。而D,非常学术化的语言,不太能跟本句的感情对应。


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/10/25 18:55:02编辑过]

作者: 柴柴新天地    时间: 2009-12-9 16:10

搜索了一下,原句引自1999年的NY times

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E03E6DF1E3EF934A15754C0A96F958260

To help deal with public fascination -- and sometimes undue alarm -- about possible threats from asteroids, astronomers have adopted a scale that rates the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will collide with Earth.

看样子E最好。只有最后的may和原句的will不同。
-- by 会员 ashura (2008/1/9 12:02:00)



从原文可以看出, a scale that rates the likelihood that  a particular asteroid or comet will collide with earth,也就是说,在这个地方是在用一个定语从句修饰a scale,而非表明用这个scale的目的,所以用C.to rate how likely a particular asteroid or comet will be to是没有必要的,相反,用D中的 for rating the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will来表修饰就刚刚合适了,所以我还是支持D
作者: gmat928    时间: 2010-2-28 20:51
这个题我选D

首先,C中rate的逻辑主语是astronomers,D中rate逻辑主语是scale。后者更加符合本句的逻辑意思。

另外,从C选项中我跟本不知道这个scale是干什么用的,只知道astronomers develop这个动作的目的(in order to)是rate sth.。可以这样理解,scale这个重要的名词在C选项中被废掉了。
而D选项清楚地表达了这个scale的功能,即a scale that can rate the likelihood。且D中没有用法错误。

To do修饰动词,逻辑主语是to do所修饰动作的发出者
For doing修饰名词,逻辑主语是for doing所修饰的名词
在没有确定句子本意判断逻辑主语的前提下,不能简单说谁优于谁。

类比例子:GWD-18-Q19
New genetic evidence—together with recent studies of elephants’ skeletons, tusks, and other anatomical features—provide compelling support for classifying Africa’s forest elephants and its savanna elephants as separate species.

A.    provide compelling support for classifying
B.    provide compelling support for the classification of
C.    provides compelling support to the classification of
D.    provides compelling support for classifying
E.    provides compelling support to classify

大家还记得这道题吗?正确答案是D,这里同样没有用to do,因为evidence作classify的逻辑主语不合适,其逻辑主语应该是compelling support,所以C比D好。

所以,以后遇到A develop/provide B 后面接to do还是for doing,判断依据就是do/doing的逻辑主语到底应该是谁。如果应是动作发出者A则用to do;如果是名词B则用for doing。

作者: edwardelric    时间: 2010-3-2 13:52
这道题目就是d gwd给错了
a大的帖子
http://www.taisha.org/bbs//thread-1225379-1-4.html
作者: messer    时间: 2010-12-13 22:36
C  astronomers have developed a scale to rate how likely
a particular asteroid or comet will be to collide with Earth

天文学家发明了一种刻度来评价当某个小行星或者彗星撞上地球时它会变得怎么样(其实这样翻译也不对)(天文学家发明了一种刻度来评价某个小行星或者彗星撞上地球的可能性 这样翻是不对的 就像我爱你 你爱我都是可以理解  但是我你爱--怎么翻)

这个Sth will be to do 怎么翻啊 谁告诉我啊 因为楼上的很多人告诉我这个语法没错啊

D.      astronomers have developed a scale for rating the
likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will collide with Earth
天文学家发明了一种刻度来评价某个小行星或者彗星撞上地球的可能性

然后大家再读原文中的句子,因为在原句中会体现考官所要表示的内容~~~原文中很明白的说的是评价可能性 当我看了楼上的
搜索了一下,原句引自1999年的NY times

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E03E6DF1E3EF934A15754C0A96F958260

To help deal with public fascination -- and sometimes undue alarm -- about possible threats from asteroids, astronomers have adopted a scale that rates the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will collide with Earth.

就可以确认D选项对了 而不是C选项
做题这么多 我发现我 或者是我们陷题太深了 完全是用语法去做题 但是我们语意又考不过别人 哎 只有继续了
作者: demiding    时间: 2017-1-6 21:18
请问谁能讲解一下这题的E选项哪里错了
作者: 再战请勿拦    时间: 2021-4-26 11:36
首先确认一下,OA是D

讲解搬运?
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/post93524.html#p93524




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3