ChaseDream

标题: [求助]prep的逻辑题 [打印本页]

作者: avimi 时间: 2007-3-4 13:29
标题: [求助]prep的逻辑题

For serveral years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Voronia rose by fifteen percent or more annually. In order to curb these dramatic increases, the ministry of health prohibited drug manufacturers from raising any of their products' prices. Even though use of prescription drugs did not expand after this price freeze, per capita expenditure for prescription drugs continued to increase by a substantial percentage each year.

which of the following, if ture, most helps to explain why the ministry's action did not achieve its goal?

A. After price increases were prohibited, drug manufacturers concentrated on producint new medications to replace existing products.
B. The population of Voronia rose steadily throughout the period.
C. Improvements in manufacturing processes enabled drug manufacturers to maintain high profit levels on drugs despite the price freeze.
D. In addition to imposing a price freeze, the fovernment encouraged doctors to prescribe generic versions of common drugs instead of the more expensive brand-name versions.
E. After price increases were prohibited, some foreign manufacturers of expensive drug ceased marketing them in Voronia.

answer: A

我怎么觉得没有选项是正确的呢？

怎么看出是A呀？

谢谢~~

作者: phoenixfr 时间: 2007-3-4 13:38

好难的问题呀！第一遍我一个答案都没看出来，回头再看的时候才选A。

政府禁止处方药涨价，处方药的销量并没有上升。但是A则是说大量代替旧药的新药上市，由于新药的价格通常比旧药高（常识），所以一样能够起到加大处方药支出的效果。所以选A

作者: avimi 时间: 2007-3-4 21:18

连这种“常识”也要考吗？ETS折磨人的方式真是变化多端呀

如果新药是由于技术进步引起的，不是更便宜嘛。

8过，这题其他选项就更扯不上了，只好这么理解了。

谢谢~

作者: laoitao 时间: 2007-3-5 21:35
A比其他好,其他是无关的

作者: 就醉一生 时间: 2007-3-6 09:17

以下是引用phoenixfr在2007-3-4 13:38:00的发言：

好难的问题呀！第一遍我一个答案都没看出来，回头再看的时候才选A。

选项没有说新药的价格一定比现存的药价高，这只是其中一种可能性。

但是如果存在这种可能性是能够解释文章所说的原因的。所以A是最佳答案。

解释题不需要充分必要条件出现，所以不应该把答案解释为由于新药的价格通常比旧药高（常识）。

作者: gonghao 时间: 2007-3-8 22:44

we have to eliminate the irrelevant and reverse answers.

A is the only one remain

作者: vivienneshui 时间: 2010-8-20 21:52
为什么E不行。。外国高价药占领V的市场，人们expenditure就上升了，不是也是一种解释吗

作者: sxf112233 时间: 2010-8-21 01:30
For serveral years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Voronia rose by fifteen percent or more annually. In order to curb these dramatic increases, the ministry of health prohibited drug manufacturers from raising any of their products' prices. Even though use of prescription drugs did not expand after this price freeze, per capita expenditure for prescription drugs continued to increase by a substantial percentage each year.
几年，每人的消费在处方药上每年上升15%。为了不让他涨，机构让药厂不涨价。处方药的用点没变，每人的消费还是上去了

which of the following, if ture, most helps to explain why the ministry's action did not achieve its goal?
解释

A. After price increases were prohibited, drug manufacturers concentrated on producint new medications to replace existing products.
沾，换药了。
B. The population of Voronia rose steadily throughout the period.
人口如何变化，无关
C. Improvements in manufacturing processes enabled drug manufacturers to maintain high profit levels on drugs despite the price freeze.
文中关心的是为什么每人消费大了而非工厂的利润
D. In addition to imposing a price freeze, the fovernment encouraged doctors to prescribe generic versions of common drugs instead of the more expensive brand-name versions.
出现有招外的其他招，无关
E. After price increases were prohibited, some foreign manufacturers of expensive drug ceased marketing them in Voronia.
外国药商，无关

answer: A

作者: yixiaoke 时间: 2011-12-12 19:36
限制的是“Raise“ ，涨价；但是新药可以定价高

作者: niclively 时间: 2014-1-3 19:41

sxf112233 发表于 2010-8-21 01:30
For serveral years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Voronia rose by fifteen percent ...

我当时觉得C关心的利润 yy多了就想如果能够保持profit不就可以讲价以后还是低成本了么.. 然后发现跟题目不是一个意思lol

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)