ChaseDream

标题: 求助三个逻辑问题 [打印本页]

作者: cxelaine1111    时间: 2007-2-18 23:17
标题: 求助三个逻辑问题

都是假设方面的:

3. Some people assert that prosecutors should be allowed to introduce illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials if the judge and jury can be persuaded that the asserting officer was not aware of violating or did not intend to violate the law while seizing the evidence. This proposed “good-faith exception” would weaken everyone’s constitutional protection, lead to less careful police practices, and promote lying by law enforcement officer in court.

The argument above for maintaining the prohibition against illegally obtained evidence assumes that

a.      defendants in criminal cases should enjoy greater protection from the law than other citizens do.

b.     Law enforcement authorities need to pursue criminals assiduously.

c.     The legal system will usually find ways to ensure that real crimes do not go unprosecuted.

d.     The prohibition now deters some unlawful searches and seizures.

e.      Courts should consider the motives of law enforcement officers in deciding whether evidence brought forward by the officers is admissible in a trial.

 

12. No botanist lives long enough to study the complete life cycle of an individual California redwood tree. Nevertheless,by observing many trees at different stages,botanies can piece together the evolution of a single tree. Exactly the same principle applies in astronomy to the study of the life-story of globular clusters, huge spherical aggressions of about a million stars all swarming about each other.

Which of the following is an assumption made in the passage above?

a.      the methods of scientists in one field generally carry over to other fields even if the subject matter is vastly different.

b.     Observations of the life cycle of a single individual have little value in scientific studies.

c.     Globular clusters at different stages of development are accessible to astronomers for observation and study.

d.     There are globular clusters that have not so far been detected by astronomers.

e.      Redwood and globular clusters must both be studied intensively now, while they still exist in sufficient numbers.

 

13. In any negotiations between a party with limited aims and an opposing party with unlimited aims, the party with limited aims is bound to lose. This is so because the scope of a negotiating party’s aims determines the energy and the perseverance that will be brought to the negotiations by that party. Which of the following is an assumption implicit in the passage above?

a.      the intensity with which parties conduct negotiations affects the outcome of those negotiations.

b.     Negotiations almost always pit against one another parties whose aims differ in scope.

c.      The outcome of negotiation cannot be correctly predicated in advance.

d.     A negotiator who has exceptionally high aims needs exceptional perseverance in order to avoid losing.

e.      Negotiating parties are typically not aware of the scope of each other’s aims until the outcome is no longer in doubt

正确答案是CA

但是我仍然很不明白:3题如何解释这个正确答案?

12题中的A为什么不能作为正解 

13题中BD看起来好象也很正确啊?


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-2-19 22:03:50编辑过]

作者: zijing4546    时间: 2007-2-19 07:27
12题中的A不对,我觉得是这么理解的,即使观察redwood tree 和观察globular clusters的method不一样,观察redwood tree 和观察globular clusters这两件科研工作也都会穷尽相关领域科学家毕生之精力(文章中说的是比一生还长). 就是说A和文中结论一点关系也没有. 再看C这个选项,其实是废话,但是逻辑上没问题,该选项就说了这样一件事情:之所以观察globular clusters是因为globular clusters值得观察(就等于在说A=A这样的恒等关系一样). in a word,出题的人太恶心了......

作者: zijing4546    时间: 2007-2-19 07:38
第13题把A带进去就变成这样的逻辑推理了,已知选项A, 已知每一个goal都需要一定的努力度, 因为unlimited goals>limited goals,所以unlimited goals 乘以 amount of effort for each goal> limited goals 乘以amount of effort for each goal, 所以intensity for unlimited goals' side> limited one 所以unlimited goals' sides 会赢.
以上的推理过程类似于:a>b 所以ac>bc (c>0)

作者: cxelaine1111    时间: 2007-2-19 12:04
对于13题,我认为题中并没有提到这个intensity的问题,那正确答案中却出现了这个问题,所以还是不能理解你的解答
作者: zijing4546    时间: 2007-2-19 12:35
我也不能解释出intensity 和effort到底是不是一个意思,题干确实没提intensity,但是我觉得,出题人在这里是拿B或者D,或者BD,当干扰项来误导你的判断,部分答题者,如果阅读能力不强(或者时间紧迫),看A选项的时候,扫一眼就过去了,来不及多思考,然后看到B,或者D,就错选他们了.B和D看着都是在说NEGOIATION,但是实际上跟题干没关系

作者: cxelaine1111    时间: 2007-2-19 12:53

那对于第三题你是怎么理解的


作者: phoenixfr    时间: 2007-2-19 16:05
12是怎么回事呀?特别奇怪。讲了2个Facts,没有结论的。
作者: phoenixfr    时间: 2007-2-19 16:21
以下是引用cxelaine1111在2007-2-19 12:53:00的发言:

那对于第三题你是怎么理解的

真是因为prohibition能够减少unlawful searches和seizures, 没有这个prohibition才有可能带来“weaken everyone’s constitutional protection, lead to less careful police practices”这些后果。如果prohibiton与unlawful searches和seizures无关,那么无prohibition就没有这些后果。

这题的逻辑思路是这样的:题目的结论说非A导致B。正确选项是,A导致C,C属于B。


作者: cxelaine1111    时间: 2007-2-19 22:07

刚刚12题题干少打了一句话,你可以再看看题干


作者: phoenixfr    时间: 2007-2-19 23:51
以下是引用cxelaine1111在2007-2-19 22:07:00的发言:

刚刚12题题干少打了一句话,你可以再看看题干

那就明白了!

这一题是一个类比题,类比成立的条件就是事物的内在性质一样。

那个树有两个性质:一个就是没有人能活得足够长去研究树一生生长的情况;第二个就是能够通过研究不同阶段的该树来研究其树的一生的生长情况。

类比对象是宇宙里面某种东东。显然尝试告诉我们性质一是符合的。正确选项C告诉我们性质2也是符合的。


作者: roger8887    时间: 2012-10-11 09:05
那我来说一下13题,已知unlimited aims tend to win the negotiation,原因是 sope of aims determines the  energy and the
perseverance。 两者的联系在哪里?当中有个GAP。我们需要把energy和perseverance与win联系起来。
于是A选项,the intensity of the negotiation,谈判的强度就需要谈判者有充足的能量和坚持才能赢得胜利很好地把这个GAP填起来,所以就是最好选项。




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3