ChaseDream

标题: GWD 29-16 [打印本页]
作者: sunfu    时间: 2007-2-12 11:27
标题: GWD 29-16

Q16:

Political Advertisement:

 

Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont’s leadership.  Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but each year since Delmont took office the average pay for the new jobs created has been higher than that year’s average pay for jobs citywide.  So it stands to reason that throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.

 

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument in the advertisement?

 

  1. The unemployment rate in the city is higher today than it was when Mayor Delmont took office.
  2. The average pay for jobs in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.
  3. Each year during Mayor Delmont’s tenure, the average pay for jobs that were eliminated has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide.
  4. Most of the jobs eliminated during Mayor Delmont’s tenure were in declining industries.
  5. The average pay for jobs in the city is currently lower than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city.

答案是D，为什么去除的工作大部分在夕阳工业就能weaken这个argument？

作者: delontewest    时间: 2007-2-12 18:45
我也想知道，请问有大侠指教吗，谢谢
作者: tracy3186    时间: 2007-2-13 17:16

好像见过这道题 但是是另一道题

Political Advertisement:

 

Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont’s leadership.  Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took office.  So there can be no question that throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.

Critics抗议说在D的管理下，工作机会减少。然而，事实不单是创造的工作多于消失的工作，而且新工作的平均薪水高于全区平均水平。所以，毫无疑问，在D的任期内，工资支票额度越来越高。

加强：减少的工作机会的平均薪水低于全区水平。

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the advertisement?

 

  1. The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure. D任期的新工作的平均工资高于前任创造的新工作的平均工资。

  2. Average pay in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office. 平均工资十年对地，是削弱。

  3. Some of the jobs created in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure have in the meantime been eliminated again. 部分的工作创造了又消失了，无关阿。

  4. The average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide. 这个对，消除的工资跟全区平均工资差不多。

  5. The average pay for jobs in the city is currently higher than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city. 不同区域情况不同，错。

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Answer: D

作者: tracy3186    时间: 2007-2-13 17:26

你问的这道题我觉得b合适 

你问的这道题我觉得b合适 

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument in the advertisement?

 

 

  1. The unemployment rate in the city is higher today than it was when Mayor Delmont took office. 支持
  2. The average pay for jobs in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office. d执政以来平均工资十年来的最低点，削弱
  3. Each year during Mayor Delmont’s tenure, the average pay for jobs that were eliminated has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide. 比较对象无意义
  4. Most of the jobs eliminated during Mayor Delmont’s tenure were in declining industries. 我觉得是无关
  5. The average pay for jobs in the city is currently lower than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city.无可比性，无关
作者: snowofjune    时间: 2007-12-10 14:46
为什么没有人过问这道题目？
作者: allright    时间: 2008-1-23 00:12

谁再解释一下啊 B为什么不行呢

作者: Lily0515    时间: 2008-1-23 04:42

GWD 29-16

我说说我的理解

这个Advertisement的方向是:在整个D任职期间, the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.->意即认为D是好市长

找WEAKEN结论

C:Each year during Mayor Delmont’s tenure, the average pay for jobs that were eliminated has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide.

原因1.因为created jobs > eliminated jobs

原因2因为新工作平均薪资高于全市平均

想想若average pay高的那群人是被eliminated的…很明显结论表示这个市长未必好

所以我认为ANS:C才是WEAKEN
                

请指教

作者: sadixni    时间: 2008-1-23 12:48

我也认为答案是C

新工作多于消失的工作，并且新工作的平均工资高于全区水平，如果消失的工作的平均工资也高于全区水平，就说明工资水平没有has been getting steadily bigger．结论句是判断工资水平的提高，因此Ｃ可以削弱结论．

换句话说，如果消失的工作的工资等于全区水平或者低于全区水平，就是加强了．

作者: kodakharry    时间: 2008-1-26 03:39

我的看法：

我也部分认为是C，但是C好像有一点无关比较，原文只有new job, job citywide,

B选项驳斥了前提，所以应该是错的

D选项比较对，因为有个declining industry，而原文是steady bigger，所以有所削弱，

附：我第一次也选择的C

作者: andiewang1    时间: 2008-2-26 06:17

1 楼的D 选项
        是:

D. Most of the jobs eliminated during Mayor Delmont’s tenure were in declining industries.

      问的是: weakens the argument

 

      3 楼D 选项是

      The average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure has been roughly
        equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide.

 

    问的是strengthens the argument

 

 

    一个削弱, 一个加强, 到底选什么, 怎么选.?

作者: andiewang1    时间: 2008-2-29 05:20
ding
作者: 顿顿的微笑    时间: 2008-3-4 18:59

UP

作者: 顿顿的微笑    时间: 2008-3-4 19:11

刚开始我也选的是B

但仔细看看发现问题可能在

B.The average pay for jobs in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.
    

C.Each year during Mayor Delmont’s tenure, the average pay for jobs that were eliminated has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide.

题目的结论说得是在MD的任期内，那么B选项在MD任职时的AVERAGE PAY 不能削弱结论，相反，如果在他刚任职时是 TEN-TEAR LOW，不正好反映了MD的领导有方。

 

这是我的一点理解，请指正

作者: dan2007    时间: 2008-3-26 06:49
up
作者: pharmacystar    时间: 2008-3-27 11:06

选C

这是一道数学问题

原文认为新工作比减少的工作多

并且新工作的平均工资比那一年的平均工资高,注意这里的平均工资是指年底经过调整以后的平均工资

所以推出  平均工资一年比一年高

C  减少的工作的平均工资也比那一年的平均工资高,weaken

减少的工作的平均工资*减少的工作数量  与  新工作的平均工资 *新工作的数量比较

如果说没有减少工作,只是不断增加工作,那么只要增加的工作的平均工资比那一年的平均工资高,当然可以推出平均工资是逐年增加的

但是关键还有减少的工作的因素在里面,有进有出,原文考虑问题不全面

这才有了C选项

纯粹的数学题目

作者: weideng    时间: 2008-4-1 16:14
LS解释的好
作者: skigorush    时间: 2009-7-29 16:46
作者: 典座    时间: 2020-6-29 12:52
答案是C，有一道同一题干的加强题选D



欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3