ChaseDream

标题: [求助]今天看了点AA，发现7宗罪难套啊 [打印本页]

作者: dreadpower 时间: 2003-11-2 20:52
标题: [求助]今天看了点AA，发现7宗罪难套啊
有好几篇都用不上7宗罪的，怎么办？？

作者: excellent 时间: 2003-11-3 17:00
你能举几个例子吗？（到常考题目中把题目贴上，大家一起讨论。）

我认为，黄金80题几乎都能用7宗罪来套用。

当然，使用时应灵活对待！

作者: dreadpower 时间: 2003-11-3 20:58
有，我正好带来了，比如17。
“this past winter, 200 students from waymarsh state college traveled to the state capitol building to protest against proposed cuts in funding for various state college programs. the other 12,000 waymarsh students evidently weren’t so concerned about their education: they either stayed on campus or left for winter break. since the group who did not protest is far more numerous, it is more representative of the state’s college students than are the protesters. therefore the state legislature need not heed the appeals of the protesting students.”
discuss how well reasoned . . . etc.
我想了一个错误：就是“不去的代表不反对”，其他的呢？？？

作者: dreadpower 时间: 2003-11-3 21:06
明天我再抄几题过来，今晚回去看看，我觉得好多题目的毛病是“lack a necessary and effective control" (我自己想出来的），但是套不上7宗罪

比如13题，“the cumquat cafe began advertising on our local radio station this year and was delighted to see its business increase by 10 percent over last year’s totals. their success shows you how you can use radio advertising to make your business more profitable.”

说咖啡公司在电台做广告，增加10%收入，我觉得有个错误在于：如果不做广

告可能增加20%，因此，少了control。除此以外，我觉得还有错误是ignore other factors

ensuring 增加10%。还有是CAFE公司的销售增加不能推广到OTHER BUSINESS。这些用7宗罪

怎么表述？？

作者: excellent 时间: 2003-11-3 21:39

以下是引用dreadpower在2003-11-3 20:58:00的发言：
有，我正好带来了，比如17。
“this past winter, 200 students from waymarsh state college traveled to the state capitol building to protest against proposed cuts in funding for various state college programs. the other 12,000 waymarsh students evidently weren’t so concerned about their education: they either stayed on campus or left for winter break. since the group who did not protest is far more numerous, it is more representative of the state’s college students than are the protesters. therefore the state legislature need not heed the appeals of the protesting students.”
discuss how well reasoned . . . etc.
我想了一个错误：就是“不去的代表不反对”，其他的呢？？？

我的建议是，拿到文章之后，先看该文章存在哪些不合逻辑的问题（哪几句话），然后针对每一个逻辑问题展开反驳。如这篇文章，作者是根据两个错误的假设得出错误的结论的。一个假设是：由于抗议的人数不多，所以抗议者不具有抗议计划的代表性。另一个假设是：由于大多数的学生或是留在学校或是离开过寒假，所以他们对教育计划不关心。

反驳“由于抗议的人数不多，所以不具有代表性”的论据：抗议的学生人数不多并不一定意味着他们就不能代表大多数同学的意愿，或许这200名参加抗议的学生就是从大多数的学生中挑选出来参加抗议的呢。

反驳“由于大多数的学生或是忙于学习或是回家度假，所以他们对抗议教育计划漠不关心”的论据，这两者之间不存在推论关系，忙于其他事并不意味着他们不关心此事，或许他们正以其它的方式（如发表文章、做演讲）进行舆论抗议。

注意，每次只找文章的一个逻辑错误来进行反驳，其他错误暂时放置一边。思路要清晰！

可能我讲的不太明白，再请高手指点。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)